Dow Chemical Company v. Nova Chemical Corporation
The Court held Nova may deduct only the costs actually incurred to obtain the ethylene used in infringing products and may not deduct capital depreciation for Western Olefins or costs for distribution, marketing, sales and R&D under subparagraph 5(a); fixed costs of the PE2 plant must be allocated to infringing products by billed volume based on discovery evidence and expert reliance; and initial PE2 capital expenditures reported in CAD should be depreciated in CAD and converted to USD annually (Soriano approach) as it is reasonable, supported by evidence and avoids punitive single-year conversion. Applying these rulings, the Court awarded Dow a judgment of $644,623,550.00 inclusive of...
- Citation
- 2017 FC 637
- Parties
- Plaintiffs/defendants by Counterclaim: The Dow Chemical Company; Dow Global Technologies Inc.; Dow Chemical Canada ULC; Defendant/plaintiff by Counterclaim: Nova Chemicals Corporation
- Court
- Federal Court
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 5 July 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Patent Infringement; Accounting of Profits Reference / Supplemental Judgment Resolving Damages and Accounting Issues
- Outcome
- Judgment for Plaintiffs on accounting of profits issues; monetary award against Nova
- Legal Topics
- Accounting of Profits, Allocation of Fixed and Capital Costs, Currency Conversion for Capital Expenditures, Damages Calculation
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Dow Chemical Company; Dow Global Technologies Inc.; Dow Chemical Canada ULC
Plaintiffs/defendants by Counterclaim
Nova Chemicals Corporation
Defendant/plaintiff by Counterclaim
Procedural Posture
Patent Infringement; Accounting of Profits Reference / Supplemental Judgment Resolving Damages and Accounting Issues
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether defendant may deduct capital depreciation and fixed costs relating to ethylene used to produce infringing products
- 2 Proper method to allocate PE2 plant fixed costs between infringing and non-infringing products
- 3 Appropriate timing and method for converting initial PE2 capital expenditures reported in CAD to USD for annual depreciation calculations
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held Nova may deduct only the costs actually incurred to obtain the ethylene used in infringing products and may not deduct capital depreciation for Western Olefins or costs for distribution, marketing, sales and R&D under subparagraph 5(a); fixed costs of the PE2 plant must be allocated to infringing products by billed volume based on discovery evidence and expert reliance; and initial PE2 capital expenditures reported in CAD should be depreciated in CAD and converted to USD annually (Soriano approach) as it is reasonable, supported by evidence and avoids punitive single-year conversion. Applying these rulings, the Court awarded Dow a judgment of $644,623,550.00 inclusive of...
Court Disposition
Judgment for Plaintiffs on accounting of profits issues; monetary award against Nova
Orders
- Nova shall pay to Dow $644,623,550.00, inclusive of pre-judgment interest to April 7, 2017, together with pre-judgment interest calculated in accordance with this Court's Judgment in Dow v Nova from April 7, 2017 to the date of this Judgment.
- Nova shall pay to Dow post-judgment interest of 5%, not compounded, from the date of this Judgment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment