Ontario. v. 2200 Sherobee Incorporated
Section 12(1)(l) of the Fire Protection and Prevention Act authorized the Minister to adopt, by reference, parts of the 1990 Building Code in the Fire Code; therefore the revocation of the standalone 1990 Building Code did not preclude its adoption by reference and the charge under s.9.6.5.5(1) of O. Reg. 388/97 was properly laid, entitling the appellant to have the appeal allowed and the matter remitted for trial.
- Citation
- C36400
- Parties
- Appellant/prosecutor: Her Majesty the Queen (The City of Mississauga); Respondent/defendant: 2200 Sherobee Road Incorporated
- Court
- Court of Appeal for Ontario
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 13 November 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Regulatory Offence Appeal / Court of Appeal Decision (appeal Allowed; Remitted to Trial Court)
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; judgments below set aside; proceeding remitted to the trial court for trial.
- Legal Topics
- Adoption by Reference, Revocation of Regulations, Statutory Interpretation, Fire Code Vs Building Code, Validity of Regulatory Charges
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Her Majesty the Queen (The City of Mississauga)
Appellant/prosecutor
2200 Sherobee Road Incorporated
Respondent/defendant
Procedural Posture
Regulatory Offence Appeal / Court of Appeal Decision (appeal Allowed; Remitted to Trial Court)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether revocation of the 1990 Building Code precluded reliance on its provisions in the Fire Code
- 2 Whether s.12(1)(l) of the Fire Protection and Prevention Act authorized adoption by reference of the 1990 Building Code provisions
- 3 Whether the charge under the Fire Code was properly laid
Ratio Decidendi
Section 12(1)(l) of the Fire Protection and Prevention Act authorized the Minister to adopt, by reference, parts of the 1990 Building Code in the Fire Code; therefore the revocation of the standalone 1990 Building Code did not preclude its adoption by reference and the charge under s.9.6.5.5(1) of O. Reg. 388/97 was properly laid, entitling the appellant to have the appeal allowed and the matter remitted for trial.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; judgments below set aside; proceeding remitted to the trial court for trial.
Orders
- Appeal allowed
- Judgments below set aside
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment