R. v. Eckstein
The trial judge found beyond a reasonable doubt that the altercation was non‑consensual and that the accused intentionally applied significant force (continued punches while the victim was defenseless) such that it was objectively foreseeable serious bodily harm could result; accordingly the accused is guilty of...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 2014 BCSC 2517
- Parties
- Crown: Regina; Accused: Rickie Eldon Eckstein
- Court
- Supreme Court of British Columbia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 17 December 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Aggravated Assault / Trial Judgment (conviction)
- Outcome
- Guilty of aggravated assault causing bodily harm
- Legal Topics
- Aggravated Assault, Consent, Mens Rea, Vitiation of Consent, Use of Force, Witness Credibility, W.(d.) Principles
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Crown
Rickie Eldon Eckstein
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal Aggravated Assault / Trial Judgment (conviction)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the altercation was consensual such that no assault occurred
- 2 Whether the Crown proved beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused intended to apply significant force or that serious bodily harm was objectively foreseeable (mens rea for aggravated assault)
Ratio Decidendi
The trial judge found beyond a reasonable doubt that the altercation was non‑consensual and that the accused intentionally applied significant force (continued punches while the victim was defenseless) such that it was objectively foreseeable serious bodily harm could result; accordingly the accused is guilty of aggravated assault causing bodily harm.
Court Disposition
Guilty of aggravated assault causing bodily harm
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment