R. v. Roach

R. v. Roach

The judge found the victim's identification reliable and accurate on the totality of the evidence (extended close proximity and duration of observation, good lighting, immediate and emphatic photo lineup identification on video, consistency of physical injuries with victim's account, and supporting circumstantial facts), and concluded the Crown proved identity and each offence's elements beyond a reasonable doubt; accordingly guilty verdicts were entered on specified counts, with weapons counts stayed under Kienapple and one count acquitted.

Citation
2010 NSSC 342
Parties
Crown: Her Majesty the Queen; Accused: Barry Andrew Roach
Court
Supreme Court of Nova Scotia
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
9 September 2010
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Trial Judgment (guilty Verdicts Entered)
Outcome
Guilty verdicts entered on Count 1 (s.268 aggravated assault), Counts 2 and 3 (s.267(a) assault with a weapon), Count 6 (s.279(2) unlawful confinement), Count 7 (s.264.1(1)(a) uttering threat), and Count 9 (s.145(3) failure to keep the peace); Counts 4 and 5 (s.88 carrying a weapon for purpose of committing an...
Legal Topics
Aggravated Assault, Assault With a Weapon, Unlawful Confinement, Uttering Threats, Identification Evidence, Photo Lineup Procedure, Kienapple Principle, KGB Statement
Source Language
English
Criminal Law Evidence Procedural Law Aggravated Assault Assault With a Weapon Unlawful Confinement Uttering Threats Identification Evidence +3 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 14 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Her Majesty the Queen

Crown

Barry Andrew Roach

Accused

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Trial Judgment (guilty Verdicts Entered)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Identity of the assailant (eyewitness identification)
  2. 2 Reliability and credibility of victim witness
  3. 3 Admissibility and integrity of photo lineup procedure

Ratio Decidendi

The judge found the victim's identification reliable and accurate on the totality of the evidence (extended close proximity and duration of observation, good lighting, immediate and emphatic photo lineup identification on video, consistency of physical injuries with victim's account, and supporting circumstantial facts), and concluded the Crown proved identity and each offence's elements beyond a reasonable doubt; accordingly guilty verdicts were entered on specified counts, with weapons counts stayed under Kienapple and one count acquitted.

Court Disposition

Guilty verdicts entered on Count 1 (s.268 aggravated assault), Counts 2 and 3 (s.267(a) assault with a weapon), Count 6 (s.279(2) unlawful confinement), Count 7 (s.264.1(1)(a) uttering threat), and Count 9 (s.145(3) failure to keep the peace); Counts 4 and 5 (s.88 carrying a weapon for purpose of committing an...

Orders

  • Guilty verdict entered on Count 1 (s.268 Aggravated Assault)
  • Guilty verdicts entered on Counts 2 and 3 (s.267(a) Assault with a Weapon)