R. v. MacDonnell
Although the offences warranted denunciation and separation, the offender's diagnosed mental disorders (factitious disorder by proxy and borderline personality dysfunction) substantially reduced moral blameworthiness and increased rehabilitation prospects; balancing aggravating factors (vulnerable victim, position of trust, harm) against mitigation (mental illness, lack of record, guilty plea, rehabilitation progress) warranted a concurrent custodial sentence of two years plus three years probation, a DNA order and mandatory 10‑year weapons prohibition; conditional sentence was inapplicable for s.268 offence.
- Citation
- 2013 NSSC 29
- Parties
- Crown: Her Majesty the Queen; Accused: Susan MacDonnell
- Court
- Supreme Court of Nova Scotia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 11 January 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
- Outcome
- Accused convicted on guilty pleas and sentenced
- Legal Topics
- Aggravated Assault, Failure to Provide Necessities, Factitious Disorder by Proxy, Sentencing Mitigation for Mental Disorder, DNA Order, Weapons Prohibition, Probation Conditions
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Her Majesty the Queen
Crown
Susan MacDonnell
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate quantum of sentence for aggravated assault and failure to provide necessities involving a vulnerable child
- 2 Extent to which diagnosed mental disorder (factitious disorder by proxy/borderline personality dysfunction) mitigates moral blameworthiness and sentence
- 3 Application of s.718, s.718.01, s.718.2 principles and proportionality
Ratio Decidendi
Although the offences warranted denunciation and separation, the offender's diagnosed mental disorders (factitious disorder by proxy and borderline personality dysfunction) substantially reduced moral blameworthiness and increased rehabilitation prospects; balancing aggravating factors (vulnerable victim, position of trust, harm) against mitigation (mental illness, lack of record, guilty plea, rehabilitation progress) warranted a concurrent custodial sentence of two years plus three years probation, a DNA order and mandatory 10‑year weapons prohibition; conditional sentence was inapplicable for s.268 offence.
Court Disposition
Accused convicted on guilty pleas and sentenced
Orders
- Custody: two years in a federal institution to be served concurrently for aggravated assault and failure to provide necessities (total two years)
- Probation: three years to commence upon expiry of imprisonment with conditions including keep the peace and be of good behaviour; appear when required; notify probation officer of any change of name, address, employment or occupation; no contact with any child under 15 except with probation officer consent; report...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment