Township of Scarborough v. City of Toronto

Township of Scarborough v. City of Toronto

Majority held the appeal because the Municipal Board committed a serious error in law by failing to take into account the changed circumstances existing at the time of its adjudication—specifically the transfer of ownership and municipal function for the waterworks to the Metropolitan Corporation—which could materially affect the annexation outcome; matter remitted to the Board for reconsideration in light of circumstances at decision time.

Citation
[1956] SCR 450
Parties
Appellant/plaintiff: Corporation of the Township of Scarborough; Respondent/defendant: Corporation of the City of Toronto
Court
Supreme Court of Canada
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
28 March 1956
Procedural Posture
Municipal Law Annexation Appeal / Appeal to Supreme Court of Canada From Court of Appeal for Ontario
Legal Topics
Annexation, Municipal Board Jurisdiction, Effect of Metropolitan Reorganization on Municipal Boundaries, Taxation of Municipal Property, Timing of Facts for Administrative Adjudication
Source Language
English
Municipal Law Administrative Law Statutory Interpretation Annexation Municipal Board Jurisdiction Effect of Metropolitan Reorganization on Municipal Boundaries Taxation of Municipal Property Timing of Facts for Administrative Adjudication

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Corporation of the Township of Scarborough

Appellant/plaintiff

Corporation of the City of Toronto

Respondent/defendant

Procedural Posture

Municipal Law Annexation Appeal / Appeal to Supreme Court of Canada From Court of Appeal for Ontario

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Ontario Municipal Board erred by deciding the annexation on the basis of facts as of the original application date rather than the date of its adjudication
  2. 2 Whether the Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto Act or other statutes fixed municipal boundaries as of January 1, 1954 and thereby restricted the Municipal Board’s power under s.20 of The Municipal Act
  3. 3 Whether transfer of municipal assets and functions to the Metropolitan Corporation affected entitlement to annexation and tax‑equivalent payments

Ratio Decidendi

Majority held the appeal because the Municipal Board committed a serious error in law by failing to take into account the changed circumstances existing at the time of its adjudication—specifically the transfer of ownership and municipal function for the waterworks to the Metropolitan Corporation—which could materially affect the annexation outcome; matter remitted to the Board for reconsideration in light of circumstances at decision time.