Desgagné v. Fabrique de la paroisse St-Philippe d’Arvida
Where construction defects are gradually revealed prescription for an action under Civil Code art.1688 begins to run from the expiry of the five-year warranty period in art.1688 (i.e. five years from acceptance/completion), so the Fabrique's action was not prescribed; architects, engineers and contractor are jointly and severally liable under art.1688 for the work in which they participated, but the architect alone is liable for the dome which was separately contracted and whose manufacture/installation he supervised or accepted.
- Citation
- [1984] 1 SCR 19
- Parties
- Appellant (architect; Cross Respondent): Lauréanne Harvey Desgagné (executrix of the estate of Léonce Desgagné); Appellant Respondent (owner/plaintiff): La Fabrique de la paroisse de Saint-Philippe d’Arvida; Respondent (general Contractor): Les Immeubles Murdock Limitée; Respondent (structural Engineer): Ernest Dauphinais; Respondent (structural Engineer): Guy Bélanger
- Court
- Supreme Court of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 2 February 1984
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (construction Defect; Action for Damages; Prescription) / Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada From the Quebec Court of Appeal (final Appeal)
- Outcome
- Appeal of Lauréanne Harvey Desgagné dismissed; appeal of La Fabrique de la paroisse de Saint-Philippe d’Arvida allowed; judgments of Superior Court and Court of Appeal set aside in part; action allowed in part.
- Legal Topics
- Architect/engineer/contractor Liability, Prescription Start Date for Gradually Revealed Defects, Joint and Several Liability, Damages and Mitigation, Statutory Interpretation of Civil Code Arts.1688 and 2259
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lauréanne Harvey Desgagné (executrix of the estate of Léonce Desgagné)
Appellant (architect; Cross Respondent)
La Fabrique de la paroisse de Saint-Philippe d’Arvida
Appellant Respondent (owner/plaintiff)
Les Immeubles Murdock Limitée
Respondent (general Contractor)
Ernest Dauphinais
Respondent (structural Engineer)
Guy Bélanger
Respondent (structural Engineer)
Procedural Posture
Civil (construction Defect; Action for Damages; Prescription) / Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada From the Quebec Court of Appeal (final Appeal)
Legal Issues
- 1 When does prescription begin to run under Civil Code art.2259 where construction defects are gradually revealed?
- 2 Whether defects to walls and dome were gradually revealed for prescription purposes
- 3 Whether architects, engineers and contractor are jointly and severally liable under art.1688
Ratio Decidendi
Where construction defects are gradually revealed prescription for an action under Civil Code art.1688 begins to run from the expiry of the five-year warranty period in art.1688 (i.e. five years from acceptance/completion), so the Fabrique's action was not prescribed; architects, engineers and contractor are jointly and severally liable under art.1688 for the work in which they participated, but the architect alone is liable for the dome which was separately contracted and whose manufacture/installation he supervised or accepted.
Court Disposition
Appeal of Lauréanne Harvey Desgagné dismissed; appeal of La Fabrique de la paroisse de Saint-Philippe d’Arvida allowed; judgments of Superior Court and Court of Appeal set aside in part; action allowed in part.
Orders
- Lauréanne Harvey Desgagné, Les Immeubles Murdock Limitée, Ernest Dauphinais and Guy Bélanger jointly and severally condemned to pay La Fabrique de la paroisse de Saint-Philippe d’Arvida $255,774.99 with interest from date of service and costs
- Lauréanne Harvey Desgagné further condemned to pay La Fabrique de la paroisse de Saint-Philippe d’Arvida $58,000 with interest from date of service and costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment