TA2-17942
The claimant was excluded under Article 1F(a) because the evidence established that the Colombian National Police committed crimes against humanity during his service and the claimant, by virtue of his rank, positions, duration of service, voluntary enlistment and admitted/inferrable knowledge, had personal and knowing participation and shared the organization's purpose, meeting the threshold of 'serious reasons for considering' complicity.
- Citation
- TA2-17942
- Parties
- Claimant: XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX; Minister: Minister (Respondent)
- Court
- Refugee Protection Division
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 19 March 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Refugee Protection Hearing With Article 1 F(a) Exclusion Consideration / Refugee Protection Division Decision (exclusion Determination)
- Outcome
- Claimant excluded from refugee protection; claim rejected under Article 1F(a) and IRPA s.98.
- Legal Topics
- Article 1 F(a) Exclusion, Crimes Against Humanity, Complicity/accomplice Liability, Particular Social Group, State Protection/internal Flight Alternative, Burden and Standard of Proof, Natural Justice/interlocutory Rulings
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX
Claimant
Minister (Respondent)
Minister
Procedural Posture
Refugee Protection Hearing With Article 1 F(a) Exclusion Consideration / Refugee Protection Division Decision (exclusion Determination)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant qualifies as a Convention refugee or person in need of protection
- 2 Whether there are serious reasons for considering the claimant complicit in crimes against humanity under Article 1F(a)
- 3 Whether state protection or internal flight alternative is available
Ratio Decidendi
The claimant was excluded under Article 1F(a) because the evidence established that the Colombian National Police committed crimes against humanity during his service and the claimant, by virtue of his rank, positions, duration of service, voluntary enlistment and admitted/inferrable knowledge, had personal and knowing participation and shared the organization's purpose, meeting the threshold of 'serious reasons for considering' complicity.
Court Disposition
Claimant excluded from refugee protection; claim rejected under Article 1F(a) and IRPA s.98.
Orders
- Claim for refugee protection rejected
- Claimant excluded from Convention refugee and person in need of protection status
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment