TA3-04657
The principal claimant is excluded under Article 1F(a) because there are serious reasons for considering he was complicit in crimes against humanity: the brigade committed widespread and systematic crimes, and the claimant's prolonged service, rank, duties, personal participation, knowledge of atrocities and demonstrated tolerance/continuing membership establish personal and knowing participation and a shared common purpose; the dependent family members are found to have well-founded fear and are accepted as Convention refugees.
- Citation
- TA3-04657
- Parties
- Principal Claimant: XXXXX XXXXX; Second Claimant: XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX; Third Claimant: XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX; Fourth Claimant: XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX; Fifth Claimant: XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX; Refugee Protection Officer: Refugee Protection Officer; Designated Representative: XXXXX XXXXX; Minister: Minister of Citizenship and Immigration
- Court
- Refugee Protection Division
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 1 March 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Refugee Protection Claim / Hearing and Final Decision
- Outcome
- Principal claimant's refugee protection claim rejected by exclusion under Article 1F(a); second, third, fourth and fifth claimants accepted as Convention refugees
- Legal Topics
- Article 1 F(a) Exclusion, Particular Social Group, State Protection, Internal Flight Alternative, Well Founded Fear, Complicity and Accomplice Liability, Knowledge and Shared Common Purpose
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
XXXXX XXXXX
Principal Claimant
XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX
Second Claimant
XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX
Third Claimant
XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX
Fourth Claimant
XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX
Fifth Claimant
Refugee Protection Officer
Refugee Protection Officer
XXXXX XXXXX
Designated Representative
Minister of Citizenship and Immigration
Minister
Procedural Posture
Refugee Protection Claim / Hearing and Final Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the principal claimant is excluded under Article 1F(a) for crimes against humanity
- 2 Whether the principal and dependents have a well-founded fear of persecution in Colombia
- 3 Whether state protection or an internal flight alternative is available
Ratio Decidendi
The principal claimant is excluded under Article 1F(a) because there are serious reasons for considering he was complicit in crimes against humanity: the brigade committed widespread and systematic crimes, and the claimant's prolonged service, rank, duties, personal participation, knowledge of atrocities and demonstrated tolerance/continuing membership establish personal and knowing participation and a shared common purpose; the dependent family members are found to have well-founded fear and are accepted as Convention refugees.
Court Disposition
Principal claimant's refugee protection claim rejected by exclusion under Article 1F(a); second, third, fourth and fifth claimants accepted as Convention refugees
Orders
- Principal claimant excluded under Article 1F(a) and claim rejected
- Second, third, fourth and fifth claimants accepted as Convention refugees and their claims allowed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment