MB0-02259
Documentary evidence established that BNP members and state actors committed disappearances, torture and extrajudicial killings (2001-2006) amounting to persecution and acts contrary to UN purposes; applying the six-factor complicity test the claimant held a sufficiently senior, long-standing, knowing and voluntary position in the BNP such that there are serious reasons to consider he was personally and knowingly complicit in those acts, therefore he is excluded under Article 1F(c) and the refugee claim is rejected.
- Citation
- MB0-02259
- Parties
- Claimant: XXXX XXXX; Intervener: Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness
- Court
- Refugee Protection Division
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 6 November 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Refugee Protection Claim With Exclusion Hearing Under IRPA / Hearing and Final Decision (refugee Protection Division)
- Outcome
- Claim rejected; claimant excluded from protection under Article 1F(c) of the Refugee Convention and not found to be a Convention refugee or a person in need of protection.
- Legal Topics
- Article 1 F(c) Exclusion, Complicity, Crimes Against Humanity, Risk of Torture, IRPA Sections 96, 97, 98, 170
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
XXXX XXXX
Claimant
Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness
Intervener
Procedural Posture
Refugee Protection Claim With Exclusion Hearing Under IRPA / Hearing and Final Decision (refugee Protection Division)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether claimant is excluded under Article 1F(c) of the Refugee Convention
- 2 Whether claimant was complicit in acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations
- 3 Characterization of BNP conduct (2001-2006) as persecution/acts contrary to UN purposes
Ratio Decidendi
Documentary evidence established that BNP members and state actors committed disappearances, torture and extrajudicial killings (2001-2006) amounting to persecution and acts contrary to UN purposes; applying the six-factor complicity test the claimant held a sufficiently senior, long-standing, knowing and voluntary position in the BNP such that there are serious reasons to consider he was personally and knowingly complicit in those acts, therefore he is excluded under Article 1F(c) and the refugee claim is rejected.
Court Disposition
Claim rejected; claimant excluded from protection under Article 1F(c) of the Refugee Convention and not found to be a Convention refugee or a person in need of protection.
Orders
- Claim rejected
- Claimant excluded from Convention protection pursuant to Article 1F(c) and section 98 of the IRPA
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment