R. v. MacLeod

R. v. MacLeod

The judge found pervasive inconsistencies, timing discrepancies, insufficient corroboration, and an apparent motive to fabricate tied to custody disputes; applying credibility principles and the requirement to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, the Crown failed to establish the accused's guilt on any count, warranting acquittals on all charges.

Citation
2003 NSPC 43
Parties
Prosecution: R.; Accused: Anthony Keith MacLeod; Complainant: Sherida Braden
Court
Nova Scotia Provincial Court
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
29 August 2003
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Trial (decision Rendered Acquittal)
Outcome
Acquitted on all counts
Legal Topics
Assault, Assault With a Weapon, Uttering Threats, Credibility Assessment, Burden of Proof, Corroboration
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

R.

Prosecution

Anthony Keith MacLeod

Accused

Sherida Braden

Complainant

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Trial (decision Rendered Acquittal)

  1. 1 Whether the accused committed the alleged assaults
  2. 2 Whether the accused uttered threats to cause death
  3. 3 Whether the Crown proved the charges beyond a reasonable doubt given timing inconsistencies

Ratio Decidendi

The judge found pervasive inconsistencies, timing discrepancies, insufficient corroboration, and an apparent motive to fabricate tied to custody disputes; applying credibility principles and the requirement to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, the Crown failed to establish the accused's guilt on any count, warranting acquittals on all charges.

Court Disposition

Acquitted on all counts

Orders

  • Accused found not guilty on all counts; acquittals entered on the record.