R. v. Desjarlais et al
The court balanced deterrence and denunciation with rehabilitation prospects for youthful and variably culpable offenders and imposed individualized sentences: suspended sentences and probation with community service for the minimally involved (Selene Skerratt, Lloyd Doyle, Daymein Skerratt), and custodial sentences with credit for pre-sentence custody and post-custody probation for principal offenders (Clayton McGrugan: effective credit accepted and sentenced to one day custody plus two years probation; Baxter Desjarlais: effective sentence 40 months with two-for-one credit reducing net custody to 12 months plus two years probation; James Vidal: effective sentence 20 months with limited...
- Citation
- 2006 BCSC 888
- Parties
- Crown: Regina; Accused: Baxter James Desjarlais; Accused: Lloyd Leo Doyle; Accused: Clayton James McGrugan; Accused: Daymein Leo Joel Skerratt; Accused: Selene Jacqueline Skerratt; Accused: James Edward Vidal
- Court
- Supreme Court of British Columbia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 8 June 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Assaults / Sentencing Reasons for Sentence
- Outcome
- Sentences individualized: suspended sentences and probation for the minimally involved; custodial sentences with credit and probation for principal offenders; selective DNA and weapons prohibitions imposed.
- Legal Topics
- Assault, Aggravated Assault, Conditional Sentence, Pre Sentence Custody Credit, DNA Order, Weapons Prohibition, Youthful Offenders, Rehabilitation Vs Deterrence
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Crown
Baxter James Desjarlais
Accused
Lloyd Leo Doyle
Accused
Clayton James McGrugan
Accused
Daymein Leo Joel Skerratt
Accused
Selene Jacqueline Skerratt
Accused
James Edward Vidal
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal Assaults / Sentencing Reasons for Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate sentencing having regard to gravity and moral culpability of multiple offenders
- 2 Weight to give deterrence and denunciation versus rehabilitation for youthful offenders
- 3 Application of pre-sentence custody credit (two-for-one rule) and limits where credit previously received
Ratio Decidendi
The court balanced deterrence and denunciation with rehabilitation prospects for youthful and variably culpable offenders and imposed individualized sentences: suspended sentences and probation with community service for the minimally involved (Selene Skerratt, Lloyd Doyle, Daymein Skerratt), and custodial sentences with credit for pre-sentence custody and post-custody probation for principal offenders (Clayton McGrugan: effective credit accepted and sentenced to one day custody plus two years probation; Baxter Desjarlais: effective sentence 40 months with two-for-one credit reducing net custody to 12 months plus two years probation; James Vidal: effective sentence 20 months with limited...
Court Disposition
Sentences individualized: suspended sentences and probation for the minimally involved; custodial sentences with credit and probation for principal offenders; selective DNA and weapons prohibitions imposed.
Orders
- Selene Jacqueline Skerratt: suspended sentence; probation 1 year with mandatory statutory conditions and additional recommended terms including 40 hours community work service; no DNA sample order; no weapons prohibition
- Lloyd Leo Doyle: suspended sentence; probation 6 months with mandatory statutory conditions and additional recommended terms including 40 hours community work service; no DNA sample order; no weapons prohibition
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment