R. v. L.K.M.
Given the seriousness and cumulative nature of intimate partner violence affecting an adult victim and a child, the offender's extensive criminal record, lack of remorse and low rehabilitative motivation, and the need for denunciation and deterrence and protection of the victims and public, a custodial sentence in a federal institution is warranted to facilitate rehabilitation. The court applied Summers remand credit (limited to 32 days) and limited Duncan credit to the 21 days relevant to these offences, imposed a total custodial term of two years consecutive to existing custody, followed by two years of probation with strict conditions, and ancillary orders (lifetime weapons...
- Citation
- 2024 NSSC 189
- Parties
- Prosecutor: His Majesty the King; Accused: L.K.M.
- Court
- Supreme Court of Nova Scotia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 28 June 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Sentencing / Sentencing Decision
- Outcome
- Sentenced to two years imprisonment in a federal institution consecutive to existing custody; followed by two years probation; ancillary orders imposed; victim surcharge exempted for hardship.
- Legal Topics
- Assault, Threats, Theft of Motor Vehicle, Resisting Arrest, Probation, Non Communication Order, Weapons Prohibition, DNA Order, Victim Surcharge, Remand Credit, Duncan Credit, Totality Principle
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
His Majesty the King
Prosecutor
L.K.M.
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentencing / Sentencing Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate length and nature of custodial sentence (provincial vs federal)
- 2 Calculation and application of pre-sentence remand credit (Summers)
- 3 Whether additional 'Duncan' credit for punitive remand conditions applies and to what extent
Ratio Decidendi
Given the seriousness and cumulative nature of intimate partner violence affecting an adult victim and a child, the offender's extensive criminal record, lack of remorse and low rehabilitative motivation, and the need for denunciation and deterrence and protection of the victims and public, a custodial sentence in a federal institution is warranted to facilitate rehabilitation. The court applied Summers remand credit (limited to 32 days) and limited Duncan credit to the 21 days relevant to these offences, imposed a total custodial term of two years consecutive to existing custody, followed by two years of probation with strict conditions, and ancillary orders (lifetime weapons...
Court Disposition
Sentenced to two years imprisonment in a federal institution consecutive to existing custody; followed by two years probation; ancillary orders imposed; victim surcharge exempted for hardship.
Orders
- Two years imprisonment in a federal institution consecutive to any existing sentence
- Two years probation to commence on expiry of custody with conditions including reporting, residency limits, abstaining from alcohol to the point of intoxication, substance and mental health assessments and programs, no direct or indirect contact with MW or her children, and exclusion zones
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment