R. v. Gilroy
The judge accepted the children’s testimony and the physical injuries, rejected the accused’s account and justification under s.43 as either inapplicable or grotesquely excessive, and concluded the Crown proved beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused intentionally assaulted the child causing bodily harm.
- Citation
- 2015 NSPC 45
- Parties
- Crown: Her Majesty the Queen; Accused: Christopher Michael Gilroy
- Court
- Nova Scotia Provincial Court
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 8 June 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Assault Causing Bodily Harm / Trial Oral Judgment (conviction)
- Outcome
- Convicted; conviction entered under s.267(b) of the Criminal Code
- Legal Topics
- Assault Causing Bodily Harm, Justification/section 43 (use of Force on Child), Child Witness Credibility, W.(d.) Credibility Assessment, Reasonable Doubt
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Her Majesty the Queen
Crown
Christopher Michael Gilroy
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal Assault Causing Bodily Harm / Trial Oral Judgment (conviction)
Legal Issues
- 1 Did the accused intentionally cause bodily harm to N. D.?
- 2 Was the use of force justified under s.43 (parental correction)?
- 3 Are the child witnesses credible?
Ratio Decidendi
The judge accepted the children’s testimony and the physical injuries, rejected the accused’s account and justification under s.43 as either inapplicable or grotesquely excessive, and concluded the Crown proved beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused intentionally assaulted the child causing bodily harm.
Court Disposition
Convicted; conviction entered under s.267(b) of the Criminal Code
Orders
- Conviction entered for assault causing bodily harm contrary to s.267(b) of the Criminal Code
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment