R. v. Power
The offender's conduct (vicious unprovoked swarming assault causing significant bodily harm) and high moral culpability required a custodial sentence; Gladue factors considered but did not render imprisonment inappropriate; a Conditional Sentence Order was available but not appropriate because the offender posed a real risk of reoffending given breaches of court orders and subsequent offending; therefore consecutive custodial terms were imposed (8 weeks for possession of stolen vehicle, 8 weeks for possession of weapon consecutive, 22 weeks for assault causing bodily harm consecutive, 5 weeks for breach of recognizance consecutive), total 43 weeks (301 days) with 105 days pre-sentence...
- Citation
- 2016 NSPC 30
- Parties
- Crown: Her Majesty the Queen; Accused/defendant: Tyler Mark Orland Power
- Court
- Nova Scotia Provincial Court
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 12 February 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
- Outcome
- Convicted and sentenced following guilty pleas; custodial sentence imposed with ancillary orders
- Legal Topics
- Assault Causing Bodily Harm, Possession of Weapon Dangerous to the Public Peace, Possession of Property Obtained by Crime, Breach of Recognizance, Gladue Principles, Conditional Sentence Order, Pre Sentence Custody Credit, Probation, DNA Order, Firearms Prohibition, Victim Fine Surcharge, Parity and Totality in Sentencing
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Her Majesty the Queen
Crown
Tyler Mark Orland Power
Accused/defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 What is a fit and proper sentence for multiple offences including a violent assault and weapons/property offences
- 2 Application of s.718.2(e) Gladue principles to an Aboriginal offender
- 3 Whether a Conditional Sentence Order is available and appropriate
Ratio Decidendi
The offender's conduct (vicious unprovoked swarming assault causing significant bodily harm) and high moral culpability required a custodial sentence; Gladue factors considered but did not render imprisonment inappropriate; a Conditional Sentence Order was available but not appropriate because the offender posed a real risk of reoffending given breaches of court orders and subsequent offending; therefore consecutive custodial terms were imposed (8 weeks for possession of stolen vehicle, 8 weeks for possession of weapon consecutive, 22 weeks for assault causing bodily harm consecutive, 5 weeks for breach of recognizance consecutive), total 43 weeks (301 days) with 105 days pre-sentence...
Court Disposition
Convicted and sentenced following guilty pleas; custodial sentence imposed with ancillary orders
Orders
- Assault causing bodily harm (s.267(b) Criminal Code): 22 weeks custody, consecutive to other sentences
- Possession of stolen motor vehicle (s.355(a) Criminal Code): 8 weeks custody, consecutive
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment