Town of Westmount v. Montreal Light, Heat and Power Co.
The majority held that under s.100 of the Westmount Charter the words used ('lot' in English and 'terrain' in French) do not encompass public streets or the respondents' poles, wires and gas-mains situated on or under streets; consequently the by-law purporting to tax "all real estate" exceeded the municipal taxing authority and the assessments on those installations were invalid, so the appeal fails and the dismissal of the action is affirmed.
- Citation
- (1911) 44 SCR 364
- Parties
- Plaintiff/appellant: Town of Westmount; Defendant/respondent: Montreal Light, Heat and Power Company
- Court
- Supreme Court of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 3 April 1911
- Procedural Posture
- Taxation / Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada From the Court of King's Bench, Province of Quebec
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; judgment of the Court of King's Bench (Appeal Side) affirmed; action dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- Assessment, Immovable Property, Bilingual Statute Construction, Municipal Taxation Powers, Easements Vs. Ownership
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Town of Westmount
Plaintiff/appellant
Montreal Light, Heat and Power Company
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Taxation / Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada From the Court of King's Bench, Province of Quebec
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether poles, wires, transformers and gas-mains placed on or under public streets are taxable real estate under s.100 of the Westmount Charter (56 Vict. ch. 54 (Que.))
- 2 Whether the French term 'terrain' or the English term 'lot' in the bilingual statute authorizes municipal taxation of street installations
- 3 Whether the respondents' installations constitute immovables or erections taxable as part of a lot
Ratio Decidendi
The majority held that under s.100 of the Westmount Charter the words used ('lot' in English and 'terrain' in French) do not encompass public streets or the respondents' poles, wires and gas-mains situated on or under streets; consequently the by-law purporting to tax "all real estate" exceeded the municipal taxing authority and the assessments on those installations were invalid, so the appeal fails and the dismissal of the action is affirmed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; judgment of the Court of King's Bench (Appeal Side) affirmed; action dismissed with costs.
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
- Judgment of the Court of King's Bench, Appeal Side, Province of Quebec, affirmed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment