Beach Town House Apartments Ltd. v. British Columbia (Assessor of Area #09 – Vancouver Sea to Sky Region)

Beach Town House Apartments Ltd. v. British Columbia (Assessor of Area #09 – Vancouver Sea to Sky Region)

Leave was granted because the proposed appeal raises questions of law about statutory interpretation of the Assessment Act, affects multiple property owners, involves a potential conflict between leading authorities on valuation methodology, has some prospect of success, and may resolve divergent tribunal decisions; accordingly leave under s.65(9) is appropriate.

Citation
2012 BCCA 409
Parties
Appellant (applicant): Beach Town House Apartments Ltd.; Respondent (respondent): Assessor of Area #09 - Vancouver Sea to Sky Region
Court
British Columbia Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
17 October 2012
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal Under S.65(9) of the Assessment Act / Application for Leave to Appeal Before Court of Appeal; Leave Granted
Outcome
Leave to appeal granted
Legal Topics
Assessment Methodology, Valuation of Cooperative Housing, Use of Comparables, Precedent Conflict (panorama V. Standard Life), Tribunal Jurisdiction for Statutory Appeals
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Beach Town House Apartments Ltd.

Appellant (applicant)

Assessor of Area #09 - Vancouver Sea to Sky Region

Respondent (respondent)

Procedural Posture

Leave to Appeal Under S.65(9) of the Assessment Act / Application for Leave to Appeal Before Court of Appeal; Leave Granted

  1. 1 Whether the Assessor's methodology of valuing cooperative housing by aggregating market sales of tenants' share‑lease agreements to determine fee simple value was legally correct
  2. 2 Whether Panorama Place (1975) is inconsistent with Standard Life (1997) and should be displaced
  3. 3 Whether the choice and use of comparables by the Assessor was appropriate given the applicable legal principles

Ratio Decidendi

Leave was granted because the proposed appeal raises questions of law about statutory interpretation of the Assessment Act, affects multiple property owners, involves a potential conflict between leading authorities on valuation methodology, has some prospect of success, and may resolve divergent tribunal decisions; accordingly leave under s.65(9) is appropriate.

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal granted

Orders

  • Leave to appeal granted under s.65(9) of the Assessment Act
  • Appeal to proceed to the Court of Appeal