R. v. Dykens
The court found the victim's present expressed consent and related evidence satisfied the Palmer test as a material and relevant change in circumstances; applying St-Cloud/Antic/Zora principles the court concluded that narrowly tailored amended conditions (express consent to communicate and contact, and presence of...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 2021 NSSC 189
- Parties
- Crown: Her Majesty the Queen; Accused: Coleman Patrick Dykens
- Court
- Supreme Court of Nova Scotia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 1 June 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Assault Causing Bodily Harm / Bail Review (section 520 Criminal Code)
- Outcome
- Application allowed; original Release Order vacated and new Release Order issued with amended contact and communication conditions
- Legal Topics
- Bail Conditions Modification, Contact Restrictions, Palmer New Evidence Test, Ladder Principle (least Onerous Conditions), Standard of Review for Bail Review
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Her Majesty the Queen
Crown
Coleman Patrick Dykens
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal Assault Causing Bodily Harm / Bail Review (section 520 Criminal Code)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Release Order condition prohibiting direct or indirect contact with the alleged victim should be amended to permit contact with the victim's expressed consent
- 2 Whether the evidence before the court constitutes new evidence or a material and relevant change in circumstances under s.520 and the Palmer test
- 3 Whether amended conditions are necessary, reasonable, sufficiently linked to statutory risks and the least onerous means to address those risks
Ratio Decidendi
The court found the victim's present expressed consent and related evidence satisfied the Palmer test as a material and relevant change in circumstances; applying St-Cloud/Antic/Zora principles the court concluded that narrowly tailored amended conditions (express consent to communicate and contact, and presence of an agreed third person) are necessary, reasonable, sufficiently linked to statutory risks and are the fewest and least onerous conditions required; accordingly the original Release Order was vacated and a new Release Order with amended contact conditions was made.
Court Disposition
Application allowed; original Release Order vacated and new Release Order issued with amended contact and communication conditions
Orders
- Release Order issued by the JOP is vacated
- New Release Order to contain all same conditions except as amended
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment