Townsend v. Northern Crown Bank
A purchaser who buys lumber by the carload, holds large stocks (e.g. 200,000–300,000 feet) and either uses it in business or resells portions qualifies as a 'wholesale purchaser' under s.88 of the Bank Act; sawn lumber is a 'product of the forest' for the purposes of s.88; therefore the bank's security taken under...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- (1914) 49 SCR 394
- Parties
- Plaintiff/appellant: Sherman E. Townsend, Assignee of the Estate and Effects of Joseph E. Brethour; Defendant/respondent: The Northern Crown Bank
- Court
- Supreme Court of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 23 February 1914
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / On Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada From the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of Ontario
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs; judgment of Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of Ontario affirmed
- Legal Topics
- Bank Act S.88, Products of the Forest, Wholesale Purchaser, Registration of Chattel Mortgages, Validity of Security for Advances
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sherman E. Townsend, Assignee of the Estate and Effects of Joseph E. Brethour
Plaintiff/appellant
The Northern Crown Bank
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / On Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada From the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of Ontario
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a purchaser who buys lumber by the carload, holds large stock and sells retail or uses it in business qualifies as a 'wholesale purchaser' under s.88 of the Bank Act
- 2 Whether sawn lumber (planks, boards) is a 'product of the forest' within s.88 of the Bank Act
- 3 Whether Bank Act security can override provincial registration requirements for chattel mortgages or bills of sale
Ratio Decidendi
A purchaser who buys lumber by the carload, holds large stocks (e.g. 200,000–300,000 feet) and either uses it in business or resells portions qualifies as a 'wholesale purchaser' under s.88 of the Bank Act; sawn lumber is a 'product of the forest' for the purposes of s.88; therefore the bank's security taken under s.88 was valid and the appeal is dismissed. Molsons Bank v. Beaudry is overruled on this point. Two judges limited the grammatical scope of the phrase 'and the products thereof' to livestock products, but that did not alter the main holding regarding lumber.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs; judgment of Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of Ontario affirmed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs
- Judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of Ontario affirmed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment