Flintoft v. Royal Bank of Canada
The written agreement created an express trust in favour of the bank over proceeds of sales of goods covered by its s.88 security and, combined with the statutory rights conferred by ss.88(2) and 86(2) of the Bank Act, the bank owned the claims against the purchasers when they arose; therefore the trustee took subject to that trust and the bank was entitled to the uncollected book debts despite the defective assignment of book debts.
- Citation
- [1964] SCR 631
- Parties
- Appellant / Trustee in Bankruptcy: Christopher Henry Flintoft (Trustee in Bankruptcy of Canadian Western Millwork Ltd.); Respondent / Bank: Royal Bank of Canada
- Court
- Supreme Court of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 6 October 1964
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Supreme Court of Canada Judgment on Appeal From the Court of Appeal for Manitoba
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Bank Act S.88 Security, Assignment of Book Debts, Priority in Bankruptcy, Express Trust Over Proceeds, Tracing Proceeds
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Christopher Henry Flintoft (Trustee in Bankruptcy of Canadian Western Millwork Ltd.)
Appellant / Trustee in Bankruptcy
Royal Bank of Canada
Respondent / Bank
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Supreme Court of Canada Judgment on Appeal From the Court of Appeal for Manitoba
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether debts arising from sale of goods subject to a bank's s.88 security belong to the bank despite an invalid assignment of book debts due to defective registration
- 2 Whether trustee in bankruptcy can claim book debts avoided under Bankruptcy Act s.63 when an express trust and statutory rights in favour of the bank exist
- 3 Whether a written agreement creating a trust over proceeds displaces the need for a valid assignment of book debts
Ratio Decidendi
The written agreement created an express trust in favour of the bank over proceeds of sales of goods covered by its s.88 security and, combined with the statutory rights conferred by ss.88(2) and 86(2) of the Bank Act, the bank owned the claims against the purchasers when they arose; therefore the trustee took subject to that trust and the bank was entitled to the uncollected book debts despite the defective assignment of book debts.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed.
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
- Bank entitled to book debts representing proceeds of sales of goods covered by its s.88 security.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment