Union Steamship Co. of British Columbia v. Drysdale
The shipping receipt created carrier liability from the moment the company received the goods (not only from loading or sailing); because the 10th clause limited time to present claims under that receipt and the receipt governed the carrier's obligations from receipt onward, the one‑month limitation applied to the plaintiff's claim for loss caused by the carrier's failure to provide a seaworthy ship; appeal allowed and earlier reversal by the provincial court set aside.
- Citation
- (1902) 32 SCR 379
- Parties
- Defendant/appellant: Union Steamship Company of British Columbia; Plaintiff/respondent: Gordon Drysdale
- Court
- Supreme Court of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 15 May 1902
- Procedural Posture
- Admiralty/shipping Appeal / Appeal to Supreme Court of Canada From Supreme Court of British Columbia (final Hearing)
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Bill of Lading, Seaworthiness, Limitation Clause, Implied Warranty, Construction of Contract
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Union Steamship Company of British Columbia
Defendant/appellant
Gordon Drysdale
Plaintiff/respondent
Procedural Posture
Admiralty/shipping Appeal / Appeal to Supreme Court of Canada From Supreme Court of British Columbia (final Hearing)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a one‑month limitation clause in a bill of lading applies to claims for loss caused by unseaworthiness of the vessel
- 2 Whether the implied warranty of seaworthiness is independent of, or subject to, limiting clauses in the bill of lading
- 3 When the carrier's contractual liability arises under this shipping receipt — on receipt of goods or upon sailing/loading
Ratio Decidendi
The shipping receipt created carrier liability from the moment the company received the goods (not only from loading or sailing); because the 10th clause limited time to present claims under that receipt and the receipt governed the carrier's obligations from receipt onward, the one‑month limitation applied to the plaintiff's claim for loss caused by the carrier's failure to provide a seaworthy ship; appeal allowed and earlier reversal by the provincial court set aside.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed with costs
Orders
- Appeal allowed with costs
- Judgment of the Supreme Court of British Columbia reversing the trial judgment is reversed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment