R. v. Smith
The court held that 'keep the peace' and 'be of good behaviour' are distinct: 'be of good behaviour' is confined to noncompliance with statutory or court obligations while 'keep the peace' covers violent or publicly disruptive conduct; on the agreed facts the accused engaged in violent public conduct amounting to a breach of the peace and therefore was guilty of failing to keep the peace under s.733.1(1).
- Citation
- 2014 NSPC 44
- Parties
- Crown: Her Majesty the Queen; Accused: Travis Christopher Troy Smith
- Court
- Nova Scotia Provincial Court
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 23 June 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Breach of Probation / Trial Judgment (s.733.1 Charge) Guilty Finding
- Outcome
- Guilty
- Legal Topics
- Breach of Probation, Keep the Peace and Be of Good Behaviour, Breach of the Peace, Mens Rea and Reasonable Excuse
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Her Majesty the Queen
Crown
Travis Christopher Troy Smith
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal Breach of Probation / Trial Judgment (s.733.1 Charge) Guilty Finding
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a conviction for failing to keep the peace and be of good behaviour under s.733.1(1) requires commission of a separate criminal offence
- 2 Whether the phrases 'keep the peace' and 'be of good behaviour' have distinct legal content
- 3 What mens rea and proof are required for breach of a probation condition
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that 'keep the peace' and 'be of good behaviour' are distinct: 'be of good behaviour' is confined to noncompliance with statutory or court obligations while 'keep the peace' covers violent or publicly disruptive conduct; on the agreed facts the accused engaged in violent public conduct amounting to a breach of the peace and therefore was guilty of failing to keep the peace under s.733.1(1).
Court Disposition
Guilty
Orders
- Found guilty of failing to keep the peace and be of good behaviour contrary to s.733.1(1) of the Criminal Code.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment