Hôpital Sainte-Jeanne d'Arc de Montréal v. Garneau et al.

Hôpital Sainte-Jeanne d'Arc de Montréal v. Garneau et al.

The Board of Directors' resolution was null because it violated the hospital by‑laws which made Medical Board recommendation mandatory before refusing renewal; therefore Dr. Garneau's engagement was not legally terminated and the court correctly annulled the resolution as the appropriate and executable remedy,...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1961] SCR 426
Parties
Defendant/appellant: Hôpital Sainte-Jeanne d'Arc de Montréal; Plaintiff/respondent: Georges Garneau; Mis En Cause: Jean Mercille
Court
Supreme Court of Canada
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
27 March 1961
Procedural Posture
Administrative Law – Judicial Review of Corporate Board Resolution / On Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada From the Quebec Court of Queen's Bench (appeal Side)
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
By Laws Compliance, Mandamus, Nullity of Corporate Resolution, Appointments and Removals of Medical Staff, Judicial Review/annulment
Source Language
english
Administrative Law Corporate/charter Law Procedural Law By Laws Compliance Mandamus Nullity of Corporate Resolution Appointments and Removals of Medical Staff Judicial Review/annulment

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Hôpital Sainte-Jeanne d'Arc de Montréal

Defendant/appellant

Georges Garneau

Plaintiff/respondent

Jean Mercille

Mis En Cause

Procedural Posture

Administrative Law – Judicial Review of Corporate Board Resolution / On Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada From the Quebec Court of Queen's Bench (appeal Side)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Board of Directors' resolution terminating the doctor's engagement was valid where it contradicted the hospital by-laws requiring Medical Board recommendation
  2. 2 Whether a writ of mandamus was appropriate relief
  3. 3 Whether a judgment annulling a resolution is merely declaratory and non‑executable under art. 541 C.P.C.

Ratio Decidendi

The Board of Directors' resolution was null because it violated the hospital by‑laws which made Medical Board recommendation mandatory before refusing renewal; therefore Dr. Garneau's engagement was not legally terminated and the court correctly annulled the resolution as the appropriate and executable remedy, notwithstanding refusal of mandamus.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Resolution of the Board of Directors dated 31 January 1956 declared illegal, null and void
  • Appeal dismissed with costs