Corporation de la Paroisse de St. Gervais v. Goulet
An appellate court cannot annul contracts when all contracting parties are not before it; because the contractors had been parties to and benefited from the trial judgment declaring the contracts valid, that judgment was res judicata as to them and the Court of King's Bench had no power to annul the contracts on appeal limited to the municipality, so the Superior Court judgment must be confirmed.
- Citation
- [1931] SCR 437
- Parties
- Appellant/defendant (municipal Corporation): Corporation de la Paroisse de St. Gervais; Respondent/plaintiff (ratepayer): Alfred Goulet
- Court
- Supreme Court of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 28 April 1931
- Procedural Posture
- Municipal Law — Action to Annul By‑law and Contracts / Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada From Court of King's Bench (quebec)
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; judgment of the Court of King's Bench reversed; judgment of the Superior Court confirmed
- Legal Topics
- By‑law Validity, Nullity of Contract, Joinder of Parties on Appeal, Res Judicata, Appellate Jurisdiction
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Corporation de la Paroisse de St. Gervais
Appellant/defendant (municipal Corporation)
Alfred Goulet
Respondent/plaintiff (ratepayer)
Procedural Posture
Municipal Law — Action to Annul By‑law and Contracts / Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada From Court of King's Bench (quebec)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an appellate court may annul contracts when not all contracting parties are before the court
- 2 Whether the by‑law complied with article 627(a) of the Municipal Code of Quebec
- 3 Whether the trial judgment in favour of contractors operates as res judicata against a later appeal not involving them
Ratio Decidendi
An appellate court cannot annul contracts when all contracting parties are not before it; because the contractors had been parties to and benefited from the trial judgment declaring the contracts valid, that judgment was res judicata as to them and the Court of King's Bench had no power to annul the contracts on appeal limited to the municipality, so the Superior Court judgment must be confirmed.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; judgment of the Court of King's Bench reversed; judgment of the Superior Court confirmed
Orders
- Appeal allowed with costs
- Judgment of the Court of King's Bench (appeal side) set aside insofar as it annulled the contracts
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment