Marine Drive Properties Ltd. (Re)
The initial ex parte CCAA order was set aside because the petitioners did not demonstrate the requisite urgency to justify proceeding without notice and, on substantive review, failed to satisfy s.11 — there was no active operating business, credible evidence showed serious risk of no equity in the key asset,...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 2009 BCSC 145
- Parties
- Petitioner: Marine Drive Properties Ltd.; Petitioner: Wyndansea Hotel Inc.; Petitioner: 0707624 B.C. Ltd.; Monitor: Ernst & Young Inc.; Secured Creditor (syndicate): Bancorp Financial Services Inc.; Secured Creditor: Bancorp Balanced Mortgage Fund Ltd.; Secured Creditor: Cooper Pacific Mortgage Investment Corporation; Secured Creditor: Liberty Holdings Excell Corp.; Secured Creditor: CareVest Capital Inc.; Secured Creditor: Gulf and Fraser Fishermen's Credit Union; Lien Claimant/contractor: Folio Hotel and Resort Architecture; Lien Claimant/contractor: Ronald Lea Architect Ltd.; Lien Claimant/contractor: William J. Reid Architect Ltd.; Lien Claimant/contractor: Mark Whitehead Architect Ltd.; Lien Claimant/contractor: Jacques Beaudreault Architect Ltd.; Lien Claimant/contractor: Mark E.B. Thompson Architect Ltd.; Creditor/claimant: Bigleaf Ventures Ltd.; Creditor/claimant: Samel Holdings Ltd.; Creditor/claimant: Adrian Karasz; Creditor/claimant: Andriana Karasz; Creditor/claimant: Cy McCullough; Creditor/claimant: Caralyn Patricia Bennett; Creditor/claimant: Dennis Robert Ohman; Creditor/claimant: Leanne Claire Ohman; Creditor/claimant: Keith Charles Shearer; Creditor/claimant: Shelley Rose Price-Shearer
- Court
- Supreme Court of British Columbia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 10 February 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act Proceeding / Application to Set Aside Initial Order Following Ex Parte Initial Order; Comeback Hearing Scheduled
- Outcome
- Initial CCAA Order set aside; nunc pro tunc relief declined; matter remitted to scheduled comeback hearing for costs and further directions
- Legal Topics
- CCAA Initial Order, Ex Parte Relief and Disclosure, Stay of Proceedings, Debtor in Possession Financing (dip), Priming Charges, Foreclosure Vs CCAA
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Marine Drive Properties Ltd.
Petitioner
Wyndansea Hotel Inc.
Petitioner
0707624 B.C. Ltd.
Petitioner
Ernst & Young Inc.
Monitor
Bancorp Financial Services Inc.
Secured Creditor (syndicate)
Bancorp Balanced Mortgage Fund Ltd.
Secured Creditor
Cooper Pacific Mortgage Investment Corporation
Secured Creditor
Liberty Holdings Excell Corp.
Secured Creditor
CareVest Capital Inc.
Secured Creditor
Gulf and Fraser Fishermen's Credit Union
Secured Creditor
Folio Hotel and Resort Architecture
Lien Claimant/contractor
Ronald Lea Architect Ltd.
Lien Claimant/contractor
William J. Reid Architect Ltd.
Lien Claimant/contractor
Mark Whitehead Architect Ltd.
Lien Claimant/contractor
Jacques Beaudreault Architect Ltd.
Lien Claimant/contractor
Mark E.B. Thompson Architect Ltd.
Lien Claimant/contractor
Bigleaf Ventures Ltd.
Creditor/claimant
Samel Holdings Ltd.
Creditor/claimant
Adrian Karasz
Creditor/claimant
Andriana Karasz
Creditor/claimant
Cy McCullough
Creditor/claimant
Caralyn Patricia Bennett
Creditor/claimant
Dennis Robert Ohman
Creditor/claimant
Leanne Claire Ohman
Creditor/claimant
Keith Charles Shearer
Creditor/claimant
Shelley Rose Price-Shearer
Creditor/claimant
Procedural Posture
Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act Proceeding / Application to Set Aside Initial Order Following Ex Parte Initial Order; Comeback Hearing Scheduled
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the initial CCAA order should have been granted ex parte
- 2 Whether the petitioners met the s.11 CCAA test to grant and continue a stay
- 3 Whether there is equity in the Wyndansea Lands sufficient to justify priming lenders
Ratio Decidendi
The initial ex parte CCAA order was set aside because the petitioners did not demonstrate the requisite urgency to justify proceeding without notice and, on substantive review, failed to satisfy s.11 — there was no active operating business, credible evidence showed serious risk of no equity in the key asset, foreclosure proceedings provided adequate protection, and any restructuring was objectively doomed to fail such that continuing the stay and approving priming DIP financing would unjustifiably prejudice creditors.
Court Disposition
Initial CCAA Order set aside; nunc pro tunc relief declined; matter remitted to scheduled comeback hearing for costs and further directions
Orders
- Initial order dated January 15, 2009 is set aside
- Application for nunc pro tunc validation of the order is declined
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment