International Ladies Garment Workers Union v. Rothman
Section 2 of Quebec statute 2 Geo. VI, c.96 authorizes summoning unincorporated groups as defendants by naming them or summoning an officer, but does not confer collective legal personality or the capacity to institute actions as plaintiffs in the group's name; accordingly the unions could not sue in their collective name and the appeal fails.
- Citation
- [1941] SCR 388
- Parties
- Plaintiff Appellant (unincorporated Association): International Ladies Garment Workers Union; Plaintiff Appellant (unincorporated Association): Dressmakers Union Local 262 (of the International Ladies Garment Workers Union); Plaintiff Appellant (unincorporated Association): Dress Cutters Union Local 205 (of the International Ladies Garment Workers Union); Defendant Respondent: Charles Rothman
- Court
- Supreme Court of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 2 June 1941
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Action (labour/contract) / Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada From the Court of King's Bench, Appeal Side, Province of Quebec
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs; judgment of the Court of King's Bench affirmed; motion to quash dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Capacity to Sue, Unincorporated Associations, Summoning of Defendants, Collective Personality, Jurisdiction to Sue and Be Sued
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
International Ladies Garment Workers Union
Plaintiff Appellant (unincorporated Association)
Dressmakers Union Local 262 (of the International Ladies Garment Workers Union)
Plaintiff Appellant (unincorporated Association)
Dress Cutters Union Local 205 (of the International Ladies Garment Workers Union)
Plaintiff Appellant (unincorporated Association)
Charles Rothman
Defendant Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Action (labour/contract) / Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada From the Court of King's Bench, Appeal Side, Province of Quebec
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Quebec statute 2 Geo. VI, c.96 confers on unincorporated groups (trade unions) the capacity to institute actions in their collective name
- 2 Whether the statutory right to be summoned as a group implies a reciprocal right to sue (ester en justice) as a group
- 3 Whether prior case law (Society Brand) remains authoritative or has been displaced by subsequent legislation
Ratio Decidendi
Section 2 of Quebec statute 2 Geo. VI, c.96 authorizes summoning unincorporated groups as defendants by naming them or summoning an officer, but does not confer collective legal personality or the capacity to institute actions as plaintiffs in the group's name; accordingly the unions could not sue in their collective name and the appeal fails.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs; judgment of the Court of King's Bench affirmed; motion to quash dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs
- Judgment of the Court of King's Bench (Q.R. 69 K.B. 154) affirmed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment