R. v. Kokotailo
Publication reporting the accused's prior conviction created a realistic potential for partiality that displaced the presumption of juror impartiality; accordingly the defence was entitled to have prospective jurors questioned and challenged for cause about their awareness of the prior verdict and its effect on their ability to be impartial.
- Citation
- 2009 BCSC 1915
- Parties
- Crown: Regina; Accused: Jamie Robert Kokotailo
- Court
- Supreme Court of British Columbia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 28 May 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal First Degree Murder Retrial / Pre Trial Conference on Application for Challenge for Cause Prior to Retrial
- Outcome
- Defence application allowed.
- Legal Topics
- Challenge for Cause, Juror Impartiality, Retrial, Section 638(1)(b) Criminal Code
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Crown
Jamie Robert Kokotailo
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal First Degree Murder Retrial / Pre Trial Conference on Application for Challenge for Cause Prior to Retrial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether publication of the accused's prior conviction creates a realistic potential for partiality in the jury pool
- 2 Whether prospective jurors should be questioned individually and challenged for cause regarding awareness of the prior jury verdict
- 3 Application of s. 638(1)(b) Criminal Code and related jurisprudence on the presumption of juror impartiality
Ratio Decidendi
Publication reporting the accused's prior conviction created a realistic potential for partiality that displaced the presumption of juror impartiality; accordingly the defence was entitled to have prospective jurors questioned and challenged for cause about their awareness of the prior verdict and its effect on their ability to be impartial.
Court Disposition
Defence application allowed.
Orders
- Permit prospective jurors to be challenged for cause by asking whether they are aware of the jury verdict in the first trial and, if so, whether that knowledge would affect their ability to be impartial and render a true verdict based solely on the evidence and law at the retrial
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment