Laquerre v. 9011-1345 Québec Inc
The motion under Rule 462 was dismissed: the applicants failed to show any procedural or substantive basis to revisit Justice Martineau’s charging order; 9011 should have appealed or sought reconsideration in a timely manner and res judicata bars reopening the decided issue; a shareholder has no proprietary interest in company property and thus lacked standing, and the hypothecary interest asserted does not provide a basis to discharge or vary the Crown’s judicial hypothec.
- Citation
- 2015 FC 440
- Parties
- Judgment Debtor: Mario Laquerre; Judgment Debtor: Fiducie Mario Laquerre; Judgment Debtor: Fiducie ML; Judgment Debtor: 9075-3153 Québec Inc.; Judgment Debtor: 9015-7769 Québec Inc.; Judgment Debtor: 9067-6388 Québec Inc.; Judgment Debtor: 9029-0065 Québec Inc.; Opponent/third Party: 9011-1345 Québec Inc.; Opponent/third Party: Gaétan Laquerre; Execution Creditor/applicant: Her Majesty the Queen
- Court
- Federal Court
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 10 April 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Income Tax Act Enforcement — Charging Order (judicial Hypothec) / Post Judgment Motion Under Federal Courts Rules, Rule 462 to Discharge or Vary Charging Order (motion Dismissed)
- Outcome
- Motion dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- Charging Order, Judicial Hypothec, Rule 462 Federal Courts Rules, Piercing the Corporate Veil, Standing, Res Judicata, Reconsideration/appeal
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mario Laquerre
Judgment Debtor
Fiducie Mario Laquerre
Judgment Debtor
Fiducie ML
Judgment Debtor
9075-3153 Québec Inc.
Judgment Debtor
9015-7769 Québec Inc.
Judgment Debtor
9067-6388 Québec Inc.
Judgment Debtor
9029-0065 Québec Inc.
Judgment Debtor
9011-1345 Québec Inc.
Opponent/third Party
Gaétan Laquerre
Opponent/third Party
Her Majesty the Queen
Execution Creditor/applicant
Procedural Posture
Income Tax Act Enforcement — Charging Order (judicial Hypothec) / Post Judgment Motion Under Federal Courts Rules, Rule 462 to Discharge or Vary Charging Order (motion Dismissed)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Rule 462 permits review or discharge of a prior charging order absent appropriate procedural steps or new circumstances
- 2 Whether a shareholder has standing to challenge a charging order against the company’s property
- 3 Whether a hypothecary creditor can obtain discharge or variation of a Crown judicial hypothec registered subsequently
Ratio Decidendi
The motion under Rule 462 was dismissed: the applicants failed to show any procedural or substantive basis to revisit Justice Martineau’s charging order; 9011 should have appealed or sought reconsideration in a timely manner and res judicata bars reopening the decided issue; a shareholder has no proprietary interest in company property and thus lacked standing, and the hypothecary interest asserted does not provide a basis to discharge or vary the Crown’s judicial hypothec.
Court Disposition
Motion dismissed with costs.
Orders
- Motion dismissed with costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment