R. v. McCormick
The judge found no evidence of police or prosecutorial misconduct sufficient to constitute an abuse of process or s.7 Charter breach, rejected entrapment (no inducement or provision of opportunity absent reasonable suspicion), concluded disclosure obligations were satisfied or irrelevant to guilt, and therefore dismissed the stay application; convictions were entered on counts 1–5 and acquittals on the remaining counts.
- Citation
- 2012 NSSC 288
- Parties
- Crown: Her Majesty the Queen; Accused: Daren Wayne McCormick
- Court
- Supreme Court of Nova Scotia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 14 March 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Post Trial Motion for Stay Under S.24 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
- Outcome
- Application for a stay under s.24 dismissed; convictions entered on counts one through five; acquittals entered on the remaining counts.
- Legal Topics
- Charter S.24 Stay, Charter S.7 Abuse of Process, Entrapment, Disclosure Obligations (stinchcombe/o'connor), Search and Seizure
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Her Majesty the Queen
Crown
Daren Wayne McCormick
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Post Trial Motion for Stay Under S.24 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether police or prosecution misconduct amounted to an abuse of process or s.7 Charter violation warranting a stay under s.24
- 2 Whether the evidence establishes entrapment
- 3 Whether disclosure obligations were breached such that the accused's right to full answer and defence was impaired
Ratio Decidendi
The judge found no evidence of police or prosecutorial misconduct sufficient to constitute an abuse of process or s.7 Charter breach, rejected entrapment (no inducement or provision of opportunity absent reasonable suspicion), concluded disclosure obligations were satisfied or irrelevant to guilt, and therefore dismissed the stay application; convictions were entered on counts 1–5 and acquittals on the remaining counts.
Court Disposition
Application for a stay under s.24 dismissed; convictions entered on counts one through five; acquittals entered on the remaining counts.
Orders
- Stay application dismissed
- Convictions entered on counts 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 of the indictment
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment