R. v. Orr
Application for a stay was dismissed because there was no evidence that the justice of the peace failed to comply with s.507 and the presumption of regularity applies; the deficiencies alleged by the accused did not meet the high threshold required to justify a stay under s.24(1).
- Citation
- 2018 BCSC 1626
- Parties
- Crown: Regina; Accused: Arlen Jeffrey Orr
- Court
- Supreme Court of British Columbia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 20 March 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Voir Dire on Application for Stay of Proceedings Under S.24(1) of the Charter
- Outcome
- Application for stay of proceedings dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Charter S.7, Charter S.24(1) Stay of Proceedings, Abuse of Process, Arrest Warrants, Criminal Code S.507, Presumption of Regularity
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Crown
Arlen Jeffrey Orr
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Voir Dire on Application for Stay of Proceedings Under S.24(1) of the Charter
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether issuance of an unendorsed warrant complied with s.507 Criminal Code
- 2 Whether police conduct constituted abuse of process justifying a stay under s.24(1) Charter
- 3 Whether there was basis to delay execution of the warrant and to re-arrest the accused
Ratio Decidendi
Application for a stay was dismissed because there was no evidence that the justice of the peace failed to comply with s.507 and the presumption of regularity applies; the deficiencies alleged by the accused did not meet the high threshold required to justify a stay under s.24(1).
Court Disposition
Application for stay of proceedings dismissed
Orders
- Stay of proceedings dismissed
- Recommendation that Attorney General review and ensure police record reasons when requesting warrants
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment