R. v. Barth

R. v. Barth

The court found the traffic stop lawful on objective grounds (visible cracked windshield and failure to display N decal) and rejected the racial profiling claim; the officer's refusal to permit use of a phone roadside and the delay in contacting counsel were justified by safety and practical exigencies and were reasonable in the circumstances, so there was no breach of s.10(b).

Citation
2021 BCSC 418
Parties
Crown: Regina; Accused: Jay Edgard Jean Barth
Court
Supreme Court of British Columbia
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
1 February 2021
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Voir Dire
Outcome
Application to exclude evidence dismissed; voir dire finds stop and detention lawful and no Charter breach of s.10(b).
Legal Topics
Charter S.9 Detention, Charter S.10(b) Right to Counsel, Racial Profiling, Search and Seizure, Vehicle Stop, Admissibility of Evidence
Source Language
English
Criminal Law Constitutional Law Administrative Law Evidence Law Charter S.9 Detention Charter S.10(b) Right to Counsel Racial Profiling Search and Seizure +2 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 17 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Crown

Jay Edgard Jean Barth

Accused

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Voir Dire

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the traffic stop and subsequent detention violated s.9 of the Charter (racially motivated stop)
  2. 2 Whether the accused's s.10(b) right to retain and instruct counsel without delay was breached by delaying access to counsel and refusing roadside phone use

Ratio Decidendi

The court found the traffic stop lawful on objective grounds (visible cracked windshield and failure to display N decal) and rejected the racial profiling claim; the officer's refusal to permit use of a phone roadside and the delay in contacting counsel were justified by safety and practical exigencies and were reasonable in the circumstances, so there was no breach of s.10(b).

Court Disposition

Application to exclude evidence dismissed; voir dire finds stop and detention lawful and no Charter breach of s.10(b).

Orders

  • Application to exclude evidence dismissed
  • Seized evidence admitted for trial