Polacik v. Symington
In the absence of a formal retainer the Master applied s.71(4) of the Legal Profession Act and assessed fees on a quantum meruit basis. The Master found recorded preparation time, particularly for chambers and cross-examination preparation, was excessive (30–35 of ~99 hours disallowed), reduced the recoverable legal fees to $13,500 (plus applicable taxes) and allowed disbursements of $1,251.70, resulting in permissible fees and disbursements of $16,709.20. Because the client had paid $19,622.29 she was entitled to a refund; she was also awarded costs of $1,762 pursuant to s.72(1), yielding a net payment by the solicitor to the client of $4,675.09.
- Citation
- 2004 BCSC 47
- Parties
- Client: Allison Polacik; Solicitor: Darrel Symington
- Court
- Supreme Court of British Columbia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 15 January 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Solicitor's Bill Review / Master's Review and Reasons for Judgment
- Outcome
- Partially allowed: billed fees reduced and client awarded refund and costs.
- Legal Topics
- Child Support Guidelines, Fee Review, Quantum Meruit, Legal Profession Act S.71(4), Costs S.72(1)
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Allison Polacik
Client
Darrel Symington
Solicitor
Procedural Posture
Solicitor's Bill Review / Master's Review and Reasons for Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the solicitor's fees were reasonable and recoverable
- 2 Whether time entries for preparation were excessive and should be disallowed
- 3 What fee is appropriate under s.71(4) of the Legal Profession Act and quantum meruit
Ratio Decidendi
In the absence of a formal retainer the Master applied s.71(4) of the Legal Profession Act and assessed fees on a quantum meruit basis. The Master found recorded preparation time, particularly for chambers and cross-examination preparation, was excessive (30–35 of ~99 hours disallowed), reduced the recoverable legal fees to $13,500 (plus applicable taxes) and allowed disbursements of $1,251.70, resulting in permissible fees and disbursements of $16,709.20. Because the client had paid $19,622.29 she was entitled to a refund; she was also awarded costs of $1,762 pursuant to s.72(1), yielding a net payment by the solicitor to the client of $4,675.09.
Court Disposition
Partially allowed: billed fees reduced and client awarded refund and costs.
Orders
- Solicitor's recoverable fee reduced to $13,500 plus GST $945 and PST $1,012.50 (total fees and taxes $15,457.50)
- Allowable disbursements of $1,251.70; total allowable fees and disbursements $16,709.20
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment