The King v. Comba
The circumstantial evidence put before the jury lacked the requisite probative force to exclude all other rational conclusions; accordingly the conviction was unsafe and the trial judge should have directed a verdict of acquittal, so the conviction was quashed and the accused discharged.
- Citation
- [1938] SCR 396
- Parties
- Appellant/plaintiff: His Majesty The King; Respondent/defendant: John A. Comba
- Court
- Supreme Court of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 23 June 1938
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal (murder) / Appeal to Supreme Court of Canada From Court of Appeal for Ontario; Crown Appeal Dismissed
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; conviction quashed and accused acquitted
- Legal Topics
- Circumstantial Evidence, Murder, Acquittal, Evidentiary Burden
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
His Majesty The King
Appellant/plaintiff
John A. Comba
Respondent/defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal (murder) / Appeal to Supreme Court of Canada From Court of Appeal for Ontario; Crown Appeal Dismissed
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether circumstantial evidence alone sufficed to support a murder conviction
- 2 Whether the trial judge should have directed an acquittal at the close of the Crown's case
- 3 Applicability of the common‑law rule requiring circumstantial evidence to exclude all other rational conclusions
Ratio Decidendi
The circumstantial evidence put before the jury lacked the requisite probative force to exclude all other rational conclusions; accordingly the conviction was unsafe and the trial judge should have directed a verdict of acquittal, so the conviction was quashed and the accused discharged.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; conviction quashed and accused acquitted
Orders
- Conviction quashed and accused acquitted
- Crown's appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment