1303678 Ontario Ltd. v. Catricala

1303678 Ontario Ltd. v. Catricala

The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, thereby upholding the judgment of the Superior Court (Justice C. Marchand, January 4, 2005) because the appellant failed to establish reversible error.

Citation
2007 ONCA 843
Parties
Plaintiff (respondent): 1303678 Ontario Ltd.; Defendant (appellant): Joe Catricala; Defendant (appellant): Linda Rojas; Defendant (appellant): Lucy Cianciulli (a.k.a. Lucia Cianciulli)
Court
Court of Appeal for Ontario
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
10 December 2007
Procedural Posture
Collection / Appeal
Outcome
Appeal dismissed.
Legal Topics
Collection Proceedings, Appeal From Superior Court, Enforcement
Source Language
English
Civil Collections Appeal Collection Proceedings Appeal From Superior Court Enforcement

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

1303678 Ontario Ltd.

Plaintiff (respondent)

Joe Catricala

Defendant (appellant)

Linda Rojas

Defendant (appellant)

Lucy Cianciulli (a.k.a. Lucia Cianciulli)

Defendant (appellant)

Procedural Posture

Collection / Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the appeal should be allowed and the judgment of Justice C. Marchand overturned
  2. 2 Whether grounds advanced by the appellant(s) established reversible error

Ratio Decidendi

The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, thereby upholding the judgment of the Superior Court (Justice C. Marchand, January 4, 2005) because the appellant failed to establish reversible error.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed.

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed.