The Queen v. Levis Ferry Ltd.
The collision was caused by negligent operation of both vessels (not an inevitable accident); Levis Ferry Limited was at fault but entitled to limit liability under the Canada Shipping Act to $40,390; the trial judge erred in applying the apportionment percentage to the limited amount and in awarding interest at 4% rather than the 5% required by s.3 of the Interest Act; judgment entered for appellant for $40,390 with interest at 5% from Feb 1, 1955.
- Citation
- [1962] SCR 629
- Parties
- Plaintiff/appellant: Her Majesty The Queen; Defendant/respondent: Levis Ferry Limited
- Court
- Supreme Court of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 11 June 1962
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal Maritime Collision / Supreme Court Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed with costs; cross-appeal dismissed with costs; Exchequer Court judgment set aside and judgment entered for appellant for capped amount with statutory interest.
- Legal Topics
- Collision, Limitation of Liability, Apportionment of Liability, Damages, Interest
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Her Majesty The Queen
Plaintiff/appellant
Levis Ferry Limited
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal Maritime Collision / Supreme Court Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether collision was an inevitable accident or caused by negligence
- 2 Proper apportionment of liability between vessels
- 3 Applicability and extent of limitation of liability under the Canada Shipping Act
Ratio Decidendi
The collision was caused by negligent operation of both vessels (not an inevitable accident); Levis Ferry Limited was at fault but entitled to limit liability under the Canada Shipping Act to $40,390; the trial judge erred in applying the apportionment percentage to the limited amount and in awarding interest at 4% rather than the 5% required by s.3 of the Interest Act; judgment entered for appellant for $40,390 with interest at 5% from Feb 1, 1955.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed with costs; cross-appeal dismissed with costs; Exchequer Court judgment set aside and judgment entered for appellant for capped amount with statutory interest.
Orders
- Appeal allowed with costs
- Cross-appeal dismissed with costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment