Phillips v. Nova Scotia (Commission of Inquiry into the Westray Mine Tragedy)
The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and set aside the stay of the Westray Inquiry: absent exceptional circumstances or a demonstrated high probability of prejudice to fair trial rights, a public inquiry within provincial jurisdiction should proceed and witnesses (including accused) are not categorically immune from compulsion; compelled testimony is subject to Charter protections (s.13 evidentiary immunity and potential s.7 exclusion of derivative evidence) and less intrusive measures (publication bans, in camera hearings, timing of testimony, withholding report) are the appropriate remedies rather than a general stay.
- Citation
- [1995] 2 SCR 97
- Parties
- Appellant (intervener): United Steelworkers of America, Local 9332; Appellant (commissioner): The Honourable Justice K. Peter Richard; Respondent (accused / Applicant): Gerald Phillips; Respondent (accused / Applicant): Roger Parry; Respondents (managers / Applicants): Glyn Jones; Arnold Smith; Robert Parry; Brian Palmer; Kevin Atherton; Respondent (intervener): Attorney General of Nova Scotia; Respondent (intervener): Westray Families' Group; Respondent (intervener): Town of Stellarton
- Court
- Supreme Court of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 4 May 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada From a Nova Scotia Court of Appeal Decision Concerning a Provincial Public Inquiry and Charter Challenges / Final Appeal Heard and Disposed by Supreme Court of Canada (appeal Allowed)
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; order of the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal staying the public hearings of the Westray Inquiry set aside
- Legal Topics
- Compellability of Witnesses, Public Inquiries, Right to Fair Trial (s.11(d)), Right Against Self‑incrimination (s.7), Publication Bans and Publicity, Derivative Evidence/immunity, Remedies Under S.24(1)
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
United Steelworkers of America, Local 9332
Appellant (intervener)
The Honourable Justice K. Peter Richard
Appellant (commissioner)
Gerald Phillips
Respondent (accused / Applicant)
Roger Parry
Respondent (accused / Applicant)
Glyn Jones; Arnold Smith; Robert Parry; Brian Palmer; Kevin Atherton
Respondents (managers / Applicants)
Attorney General of Nova Scotia
Respondent (intervener)
Westray Families' Group
Respondent (intervener)
Town of Stellarton
Respondent (intervener)
Procedural Posture
Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada From a Nova Scotia Court of Appeal Decision Concerning a Provincial Public Inquiry and Charter Challenges / Final Appeal Heard and Disposed by Supreme Court of Canada (appeal Allowed)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether managers charged with criminal offences are compellable witnesses at a provincial public inquiry
- 2 Whether proceeding with the Inquiry would breach ss.7 or 11(d) of the Charter
- 3 Whether a temporary stay of public hearings is a just and appropriate remedy under s.24(1) of the Charter
Ratio Decidendi
The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and set aside the stay of the Westray Inquiry: absent exceptional circumstances or a demonstrated high probability of prejudice to fair trial rights, a public inquiry within provincial jurisdiction should proceed and witnesses (including accused) are not categorically immune from compulsion; compelled testimony is subject to Charter protections (s.13 evidentiary immunity and potential s.7 exclusion of derivative evidence) and less intrusive measures (publication bans, in camera hearings, timing of testimony, withholding report) are the appropriate remedies rather than a general stay.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; order of the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal staying the public hearings of the Westray Inquiry set aside
Orders
- Appeal allowed
- Stay of the Westray Inquiry public hearings set aside and hearings may proceed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment