Town of Montmagny v. Letourneau

Town of Montmagny v. Letourneau

Majority held the arbitrators were within their jurisdiction because whether the land had a present marketable value as town building lots was a factual question for the arbitrators; the appellant failed to prove the arbitrators appraised something outside their authority or used a later valuation date, and statutory finality (art. 5797 R.S.Q.) prevents court reversal absent proven excess of jurisdiction, so the appeal is dismissed.

Citation
(1917) 55 SCR 543
Parties
Appellant/plaintiff: Town of Montmagny; Respondent/defendant: Ludger Letourneau
Court
Supreme Court of Canada
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
22 June 1917
Procedural Posture
Expropriation Appeal / Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada From the Court of King's Bench, Province of Quebec
Outcome
Appeal dismissed with costs (majority); Davies and Idington JJ. dissenting
Legal Topics
Compensation, Valuation of Land, Arbitration Jurisdiction, Finality of Awards, Excess of Jurisdiction
Source Language
English
Expropriation Property Law Arbitration Administrative Law Compensation Valuation of Land Arbitration Jurisdiction Finality of Awards +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Town of Montmagny

Appellant/plaintiff

Ludger Letourneau

Respondent/defendant

Procedural Posture

Expropriation Appeal / Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada From the Court of King's Bench, Province of Quebec

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether arbitrators exceeded their jurisdiction by valuing expropriated land as town building lots rather than as agricultural property
  2. 2 Whether the arbitrators based their award on a valuation date later than the date of expropriation (thus appraising something they were not authorized to appraise)
  3. 3 Whether the statutory finality of the arbitrators' award (art. 5797 R.S.Q.) precludes court review absent proof of excess of jurisdiction

Ratio Decidendi

Majority held the arbitrators were within their jurisdiction because whether the land had a present marketable value as town building lots was a factual question for the arbitrators; the appellant failed to prove the arbitrators appraised something outside their authority or used a later valuation date, and statutory finality (art. 5797 R.S.Q.) prevents court reversal absent proven excess of jurisdiction, so the appeal is dismissed.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed with costs (majority); Davies and Idington JJ. dissenting

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed with costs