Zurich Life Insurance Co. of Canada v. Davies
The Conditional Insurance Agreement, construed against the insurer as a contract of adhesion and in the absence of an express condition making coverage contingent on prior proof of insurability, created interim insurance upon payment and issuance; the insurer bore the onus to prove the deceased was uninsurable at the application date and failed to meet that onus, so the appeal was dismissed and the respondent's claim allowed.
- Citation
- [1981] 2 SCR 670
- Parties
- Appellant / Plaintiff: Zurich Life Insurance Co. of Canada; Respondent / Defendant: Barbara Wallace Davies
- Court
- Supreme Court of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 17 December 1981
- Procedural Posture
- Contract Insurance / Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada From the Ontario Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs; Court of Appeal judgment allowing the respondent's claim affirmed.
- Legal Topics
- Conditional Insurance Agreement, Condition Precedent Vs Condition Subsequent, Onus of Proof on Insurer, Contra Proferentem, Interim Insurance, Adhesion Contract
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Zurich Life Insurance Co. of Canada
Appellant / Plaintiff
Barbara Wallace Davies
Respondent / Defendant
Procedural Posture
Contract Insurance / Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada From the Ontario Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Conditional Insurance Agreement created coverage only upon prior proof of insurability (condition precedent) or provided immediate interim coverage defeasible upon later proof of uninsurability (condition subsequent)
- 2 Whether the insurer bore the onus to prove that the applicant was uninsurable at the date of application
Ratio Decidendi
The Conditional Insurance Agreement, construed against the insurer as a contract of adhesion and in the absence of an express condition making coverage contingent on prior proof of insurability, created interim insurance upon payment and issuance; the insurer bore the onus to prove the deceased was uninsurable at the application date and failed to meet that onus, so the appeal was dismissed and the respondent's claim allowed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs; Court of Appeal judgment allowing the respondent's claim affirmed.
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
- Respondent's claim for the insurance proceeds allowed (insurer to pay).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment