Mitsui & Co. (Canada) Ltd. v. Royal Bank of Canada
The leases contained true unilateral options to purchase within the meaning of s.2(1)(b)(ii) of the Conditional Sales Act (the notice and valuation steps were conditions precedent to exercise, not elements converting the option into a right of pre-emption), options exercisable at fair market value are enforceable, and because the leases were not registered as required the lessor's reservation of title is void against the appellants; appeal allowed.
- Citation
- [1995] 2 SCR 187
- Parties
- Appellant (secured Creditor): Royal Bank of Canada; Appellant (receiver and Manager of Pegasus Helicopters Incorporated): Doane Raymond Limited; Appellant (trustee of the Estate of Pegasus Helicopters Incorporated): Peat Marwick Thorne Inc.; Respondent (lessor): Mitsui & Co. (Canada) Ltd.
- Court
- Supreme Court of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 4 May 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal to Supreme Court of Canada / Final Adjudication on Appeal From Nova Scotia Court of Appeal; Judgment on Merits
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Conditional Sales Act, Option to Purchase, Registration and Priority, True Lease Vs Conditional Sale, Receiver Appointment
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Royal Bank of Canada
Appellant (secured Creditor)
Doane Raymond Limited
Appellant (receiver and Manager of Pegasus Helicopters Incorporated)
Peat Marwick Thorne Inc.
Appellant (trustee of the Estate of Pegasus Helicopters Incorporated)
Mitsui & Co. (Canada) Ltd.
Respondent (lessor)
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal to Supreme Court of Canada / Final Adjudication on Appeal From Nova Scotia Court of Appeal; Judgment on Merits
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether leases containing an option to purchase fall within s.2(1)(b)(ii) of the Conditional Sales Act
- 2 Whether clause 32 constituted an option to compel sale or merely a right of pre-emption/right of first refusal
- 3 Whether failure to register the lease-option under the Conditional Sales Act renders the lessor's reservation of title void against secured creditors/receiver
Ratio Decidendi
The leases contained true unilateral options to purchase within the meaning of s.2(1)(b)(ii) of the Conditional Sales Act (the notice and valuation steps were conditions precedent to exercise, not elements converting the option into a right of pre-emption), options exercisable at fair market value are enforceable, and because the leases were not registered as required the lessor's reservation of title is void against the appellants; appeal allowed.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed with costs
Orders
- Appeal allowed with costs throughout
- Each lease declared to fall within the scope of s.2(1)(b)(ii) of the Conditional Sales Act and, having not been registered, the respondent's reservation of title is void against the appellants
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment