Commercial Credit Corpn. of Canada Ltd. v. Niagara Finance Co. Ltd.

Commercial Credit Corpn. of Canada Ltd. v. Niagara Finance Co. Ltd.

The respondent, having purchased from the bailiff under execution, was not a "subsequent purchaser claiming from or under" the conditional purchaser within s.2(1); the bailiff could convey only the execution debtor's interest, therefore the unregistered conditional sale remained effective against the respondent and the appellant was entitled to judgment for the value of the car.

Citation
[1940] SCR 420
Parties
Plaintiff/appellant: Commercial Credit Corporation of Canada, Limited; Defendant/respondent: Niagara Finance Company, Limited
Court
Supreme Court of Canada
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
21 May 1940
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal – Conversion/possession Arising From Conditional Sale and Execution Sale / Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada From the Court of Appeal for Ontario
Outcome
Appeal allowed.
Legal Topics
Conditional Sale, Registration Requirements, Bailiff/sheriff Sale, Subsequent Purchaser, Notice and Good Faith, Priority Against Creditors
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Commercial Credit Corporation of Canada, Limited

Plaintiff/appellant

Niagara Finance Company, Limited

Defendant/respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal – Conversion/possession Arising From Conditional Sale and Execution Sale / Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada From the Court of Appeal for Ontario

  1. 1 Whether a purchaser at a bailiff's sale under executions is a "subsequent purchaser claiming from or under" the conditional purchaser within s.2(1) of the Conditional Sales Act
  2. 2 Whether failure to register a conditional sale renders it invalid as against a purchaser at a bailiff's sale
  3. 3 Whether a bailiff's sale conveys full ownership or only the execution debtor's equitable interest

Ratio Decidendi

The respondent, having purchased from the bailiff under execution, was not a "subsequent purchaser claiming from or under" the conditional purchaser within s.2(1); the bailiff could convey only the execution debtor's interest, therefore the unregistered conditional sale remained effective against the respondent and the appellant was entitled to judgment for the value of the car.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed.

Orders

  • Judgment entered for appellant in the sum of $250 with costs of the action and of the appeal to the Court of Appeal for Ontario.
  • No costs awarded for the appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada (per leave condition).