Goodison Thresher Co. v. Township of McNab
The statutory proviso in s.10(3) imposes an obligatory condition precedent (laying sufficient planks/strengthening) before traction engines under eight tons may lawfully cross bridges or culverts; failure to observe that condition makes the crossing unlawful and bars recovery for damages caused by that unlawful use, because the planking was intended to protect and strengthen the flooring and prevent the flooring from giving way.
- Citation
- (1910) 44 SCR 187
- Parties
- Appellant/plaintiff: The John Goodison Thresher Company; Respondent/defendant: Township of McNab
- Court
- Supreme Court of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 23 December 1910
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada From the Court of Appeal for Ontario
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; judgment of the Court of Appeal for Ontario affirmed by majority
- Legal Topics
- Condition Precedent, Duty to Strengthen Bridges, Liability for Unlawful Use, Traction Engines on Highways
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The John Goodison Thresher Company
Appellant/plaintiff
Township of McNab
Respondent/defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada From the Court of Appeal for Ontario
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether s.10(3) of R.S.O. (1897) ch.242 imposes a condition precedent (planking/strengthening) before a traction engine under eight tons may lawfully cross a bridge or culvert
- 2 Whether the proviso’s requirement to lay planks was intended only to protect the surface of the bridge or also to prevent the flooring/stringers from giving way
- 3 Whether failure to comply with the statutory requirement bars recovery for damage caused by the crossing and renders the crossing unlawful
Ratio Decidendi
The statutory proviso in s.10(3) imposes an obligatory condition precedent (laying sufficient planks/strengthening) before traction engines under eight tons may lawfully cross bridges or culverts; failure to observe that condition makes the crossing unlawful and bars recovery for damages caused by that unlawful use, because the planking was intended to protect and strengthen the flooring and prevent the flooring from giving way.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; judgment of the Court of Appeal for Ontario affirmed by majority
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs
- Judgment of the Court of Appeal for Ontario (19 Ont. L.R. 188) affirmed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment