McInnis (Re)
Given the PA's knowledge of a prior court order, its role in formulating and recommending an unreasonable and not‑in‑good‑faith consumer proposal, its attempt to remove the matter from court supervision by an informal fee agreement, and the seriousness of involvement by an unregulated debt advisor, the Court exercised its supervisory authority to tax the PA's accounts at nil (inclusive of disbursements) and ordered turnover of funds held to the prior trustee under s.67 BIA.
- Citation
- 2026 NSSC 10
- Parties
- Proposal Administrator: Harris & Partners Inc.; Regulatory Intervener: Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy; Debtor/bankrupt: Terrance Francis McInnis; Prior Trustee: Rita Anderson & Associates Inc.
- Court
- Supreme Court of Nova Scotia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 12 January 2026
- Procedural Posture
- Taxation of Proposal Administrator's Accounts Under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act / Decision Following Taxation Hearing and Case Management Conference
- Outcome
- Accounts taxed at nil inclusive of disbursements; funds held by the Proposal Administrator in the amount of $1,750 (plus accrued interest) are after‑acquired property of the bankrupt and to be turned over to Rita Anderson & Associates Inc. forthwith; directions regarding reappointment of trustee if necessary and...
- Legal Topics
- Consumer Proposal, Taxation of Accounts, Licensed Insolvency Trustee Conduct and Ethics, Debt Advisory Marketplace and Lead Generators, Turnover of After‑acquired Property
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Harris & Partners Inc.
Proposal Administrator
Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy
Regulatory Intervener
Terrance Francis McInnis
Debtor/bankrupt
Rita Anderson & Associates Inc.
Prior Trustee
Procedural Posture
Taxation of Proposal Administrator's Accounts Under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act / Decision Following Taxation Hearing and Case Management Conference
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Proposal Administrator's fees and disbursements are payable given its conduct and failure to disclose a prior court order
- 2 Whether the Court should exercise its supervisory authority to tax accounts despite parties' agreement to a fee reduction
- 3 Whether funds held by the PA are after‑acquired property of the bankrupt under s.67 BIA and must be turned over to the prior trustee
Ratio Decidendi
Given the PA's knowledge of a prior court order, its role in formulating and recommending an unreasonable and not‑in‑good‑faith consumer proposal, its attempt to remove the matter from court supervision by an informal fee agreement, and the seriousness of involvement by an unregulated debt advisor, the Court exercised its supervisory authority to tax the PA's accounts at nil (inclusive of disbursements) and ordered turnover of funds held to the prior trustee under s.67 BIA.
Court Disposition
Accounts taxed at nil inclusive of disbursements; funds held by the Proposal Administrator in the amount of $1,750 (plus accrued interest) are after‑acquired property of the bankrupt and to be turned over to Rita Anderson & Associates Inc. forthwith; directions regarding reappointment of trustee if necessary and...
Orders
- Proposal Administrator's fees and disbursements taxed at nil
- Proposal Administrator to turn over $1,750 plus accrued interest to Rita Anderson & Associates Inc. forthwith as after‑acquired property of the bankrupt pursuant to s.67 BIA
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment