Sickinger v. Sickinger

Sickinger v. Sickinger

The Court dismissed the appeal because the motion judge properly concluded parts of the dispute were outside the dispute resolution clauses, properly exercised discretion in declining a stay given urgency and alleged parental alienation, and had sufficient non-hearsay and original evidence, including the mother's...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2009 ONCA 856
Parties
Applicant (appellant): Penelope Kay Sickinger; Respondent (respondent in Appeal): Ralph Thomas James Sickinger
Court
Court of Appeal for Ontario
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
4 December 2009
Procedural Posture
Family / Appeal From Superior Court Motion Judge's Order (hearing in Court of Appeal)
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; motion for fresh evidence dismissed as moot; costs awarded to respondent.
Legal Topics
Contempt, Stay, Dispute Resolution Clauses, Parental Alienation, Evidence, Costs
Source Language
english
Family Law Contempt Stay Dispute Resolution Clauses Parental Alienation Evidence Costs

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Penelope Kay Sickinger

Applicant (appellant)

Ralph Thomas James Sickinger

Respondent (respondent in Appeal)

Procedural Posture

Family / Appeal From Superior Court Motion Judge's Order (hearing in Court of Appeal)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the motion judge had jurisdiction given dispute resolution clauses
  2. 2 Whether the matter should have been stayed for father's failure to meet financial commitments
  3. 3 Whether a contempt finding required a trial or viva voce evidence/cross-examination

Ratio Decidendi

The Court dismissed the appeal because the motion judge properly concluded parts of the dispute were outside the dispute resolution clauses, properly exercised discretion in declining a stay given urgency and alleged parental alienation, and had sufficient non-hearsay and original evidence, including the mother's admissions, to support the contempt finding; the appellant's procedural choices at the motion precluded appellate complaint and the fresh evidence motion was moot.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; motion for fresh evidence dismissed as moot; costs awarded to respondent.

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed.
  • Motion for fresh evidence dismissed as moot.