Wabash Railroad Co. v. Misener
The jury's findings that the statutory signals were not given and that the deceased was not contributorily negligent were not perverse and were supported by evidence; therefore the case was properly submitted to the jury and the verdict for the plaintiffs was affirmed, so the appeal is dismissed.
- Citation
- (1906) 38 SCR 94
- Parties
- Defendant Appellant: Wabash Railroad Company; Plaintiff Respondent: Isabella Misener and Others
- Court
- Supreme Court of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 11 December 1906
- Procedural Posture
- Tort (negligence) / Appeal to Supreme Court of Canada From Court of Appeal for Ontario
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- Contributory Negligence, Duty to Look and Listen at Railway Crossings, Statutory Warning Signals (whistle and Bell)
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Wabash Railroad Company
Defendant Appellant
Isabella Misener and Others
Plaintiff Respondent
Procedural Posture
Tort (negligence) / Appeal to Supreme Court of Canada From Court of Appeal for Ontario
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether defendant was negligent in failing to sound whistle and ring bell at the crossing
- 2 Whether the plaintiffs proved that that negligence was the proximate cause of the death
- 3 Whether deceased was contributorily negligent by failing to look again before crossing
Ratio Decidendi
The jury's findings that the statutory signals were not given and that the deceased was not contributorily negligent were not perverse and were supported by evidence; therefore the case was properly submitted to the jury and the verdict for the plaintiffs was affirmed, so the appeal is dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment