MA1-05556
The panel accepted the claimants' identities and, notwithstanding some inconsistencies, found their testimony and documentary evidence sufficiently credible; country evidence and the claimants' experiences established discrimination and police apathy in Romania such that effective state protection was unavailable, creating a well-founded fear of persecution for the claimants (Roma nationality and woman victim of violence), and therefore they qualify as Convention refugees under s.96 IRPA.
- Citation
- MA1-05556
- Parties
- Claimant Principal: XXXXXXXX; Claimant Spouse: XXXXXXXXXX; Claimant Child (represented by Mother): XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX; Panel Member / Decision Maker: Me Yves Boisrond; Refugee Protection Officer: Lawrence Lesarge; Claimant's Counsel: Me Leonard Manzararu
- Court
- Refugee Protection Division
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 30 July 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Refugee Protection Claim Under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (convention Ground) / Hearing and Decision at Refugee Protection Division (hearing July 11 12, 2002; Decision July 30, 2002)
- Outcome
- Allowed: claimants recognized as Convention refugees
- Legal Topics
- Convention Refugee, Well Founded Fear of Persecution, State Protection, Membership of a Particular Social Group, Credibility Assessment, Nationality Discrimination, Gender Based Violence
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
XXXXXXXX
Claimant Principal
XXXXXXXXXX
Claimant Spouse
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Claimant Child (represented by Mother)
Me Yves Boisrond
Panel Member / Decision Maker
Lawrence Lesarge
Refugee Protection Officer
Me Leonard Manzararu
Claimant's Counsel
Procedural Posture
Refugee Protection Claim Under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (convention Ground) / Hearing and Decision at Refugee Protection Division (hearing July 11 12, 2002; Decision July 30, 2002)
Legal Issues
- 1 Identity verification of claimants
- 2 Credibility of testimony and documentary evidence
- 3 Whether state protection in Romania was available and effective
Ratio Decidendi
The panel accepted the claimants' identities and, notwithstanding some inconsistencies, found their testimony and documentary evidence sufficiently credible; country evidence and the claimants' experiences established discrimination and police apathy in Romania such that effective state protection was unavailable, creating a well-founded fear of persecution for the claimants (Roma nationality and woman victim of violence), and therefore they qualify as Convention refugees under s.96 IRPA.
Court Disposition
Allowed: claimants recognized as Convention refugees
Orders
- Mr. XXXXXXXX, Ms. XXXXXXXXXX and their daughter XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX are declared Convention refugees pursuant to section 96 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment