CA4-00972
Claim rejected because the evidence established a viable internal flight alternative in Venezuela and the claimant's experiences, taken cumulatively, constituted harassment rather than persecution on a Convention ground; removal would not expose her to a serious risk of torture or cruel and unusual treatment.
- Citation
- CA4-00972
- Parties
- Claimant: XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX; Refugee Protection Officer: M. Embaie
- Court
- Refugee Protection Division
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 15 July 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Refugee Protection Claim / Hearing and Decision (refugee Protection Division)
- Outcome
- Claim rejected — not a Convention refugee and not a person in need of protection
- Legal Topics
- Convention Refugee, Internal Flight Alternative, Political Opinion, Persecution, Risk of Torture, Protection Claim Assessment
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX
Claimant
M. Embaie
Refugee Protection Officer
Procedural Posture
Refugee Protection Claim / Hearing and Decision (refugee Protection Division)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant is a Convention refugee
- 2 Whether a viable internal flight alternative exists in Venezuela
- 3 Whether incidents complained of constitute persecution on a Convention ground
Ratio Decidendi
Claim rejected because the evidence established a viable internal flight alternative in Venezuela and the claimant's experiences, taken cumulatively, constituted harassment rather than persecution on a Convention ground; removal would not expose her to a serious risk of torture or cruel and unusual treatment.
Court Disposition
Claim rejected — not a Convention refugee and not a person in need of protection
Orders
- Refugee protection claim dismissed
- No protection order granted
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment