CA5-00176
Panel accepted claimant's PPP/PSF membership but found central allegations not credible and corroborative documents unreliable or fabricated; independent country evidence indicated political harassment was generally isolated and targeted senior figures; claimant has a viable internal flight alternative; therefore no serious possibility of persecution for political opinion exists and claimant is not a Convention refugee or person in need of protection.
- Citation
- CA5-00176
- Parties
- Claimant: XXXX XXXX XXXX; Claimant's Counsel: Michael Sherritt; Refugee Protection Officer: Refugee Protection Officer; Presiding Member: Gordon McKenzie; Designated Representative: Designated Representative; Minister's Counsel: Minister's Counsel
- Court
- Refugee Protection Division
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 10 January 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Refugee Protection Claim / Hearing and Decision
- Outcome
- Claim rejected; claimant is not a Convention refugee and not a person in need of protection
- Legal Topics
- Convention Refugee, Political Opinion, Internal Flight Alternative, Credibility and Corroboration, Document Authenticity
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
XXXX XXXX XXXX
Claimant
Michael Sherritt
Claimant's Counsel
Refugee Protection Officer
Refugee Protection Officer
Gordon McKenzie
Presiding Member
Designated Representative
Designated Representative
Minister's Counsel
Minister's Counsel
Procedural Posture
Refugee Protection Claim / Hearing and Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether claimant is a Convention refugee under IRPA ss.96 and 97(1)
- 2 Whether claimant faces persecution for political opinion
- 3 Whether claimant's testimony and corroborating documents are credible and authentic
Ratio Decidendi
Panel accepted claimant's PPP/PSF membership but found central allegations not credible and corroborative documents unreliable or fabricated; independent country evidence indicated political harassment was generally isolated and targeted senior figures; claimant has a viable internal flight alternative; therefore no serious possibility of persecution for political opinion exists and claimant is not a Convention refugee or person in need of protection.
Court Disposition
Claim rejected; claimant is not a Convention refugee and not a person in need of protection
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment