MA5-03959

The claimants' refugee protection claim is rejected because the adjudicator found the principal allegations of abduction and serious persecution not credible due to material contradictions and implausibilities, and the medical reports were insufficiently substantiated to establish persecution or risk of treatment meeting IRPA s.97.

Citation: MA5-03959
Parties: Claimant: XXXXX XXXXX; Co Claimant: XXXXX XXXXX; Dependent Minor: XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX
Court: Refugee Protection Division
Jurisdiction: Canada
Judgment Date: 24 May 2007
Procedural Posture: Refugee Protection Claim / Decision Following Hearing
Outcome: Refugee protection claim rejected for all claimants
Legal Topics: Convention Refugee, Person in Need of Protection, Political Opinion, Persecution, Credibility Assessment, Medical/psychological Evidence, Visa Issues, Abduction, Family Dependence
Source Language: English

Immigration Refugee Law Asylum Human Rights Administrative Law Convention Refugee Person in Need of Protection Political Opinion +6 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Parties

XXXXX XXXXX

Claimant

XXXXX XXXXX

Co Claimant

XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX

Dependent Minor

Procedural Posture

Refugee Protection Claim / Decision Following Hearing

Legal Issues

1 Whether claimants have a well-founded fear of persecution for political opinion
2 Credibility of allegations of abduction, beating and threats
3 Whether internal protection was available or sought

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Refugee protection claim rejected for all claimants

Orders

Refugee protection claim rejected for XXXXX XXXXX, XXXXX XXXXX, XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX and XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX