MB2-00570

MB2-00570

The panel rejected the claim because the claimant was not credible on essential elements—his asserted UDPS membership and recruitment activities were uncorroborated and contradicted by his testimony and documentary inquiry, so he did not establish a well‑founded fear of persecution or a risk of torture or cruel treatment under IRPA ss.96 and 97(1).

Citation
MB2-00570
Parties
Claimant: XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX
Court
Refugee Protection Division
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
22 February 2013
Procedural Posture
Refugee Protection (rpd) / Final Hearing and Decision
Outcome
Claim rejected; claimant is not a Convention refugee or a person in need of protection.
Legal Topics
Convention Refugee, Political Participation, Membership of Political Party, Credibility, Arbitrary Arrest and Detention, Risk of Torture, Risk of Cruel and Unusual Treatment
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX

Claimant

Procedural Posture

Refugee Protection (rpd) / Final Hearing and Decision

  1. 1 Whether the claimant is a member of the UDPS
  2. 2 Whether the claimant was persecuted or faces a risk on a Convention ground
  3. 3 Credibility and corroboration of claimant's allegations

Ratio Decidendi

The panel rejected the claim because the claimant was not credible on essential elements—his asserted UDPS membership and recruitment activities were uncorroborated and contradicted by his testimony and documentary inquiry, so he did not establish a well‑founded fear of persecution or a risk of torture or cruel treatment under IRPA ss.96 and 97(1).

Court Disposition

Claim rejected; claimant is not a Convention refugee or a person in need of protection.

Orders

  • Claim dismissed