MB2-00570
The panel rejected the claim because the claimant was not credible on essential elements—his asserted UDPS membership and recruitment activities were uncorroborated and contradicted by his testimony and documentary inquiry, so he did not establish a well‑founded fear of persecution or a risk of torture or cruel treatment under IRPA ss.96 and 97(1).
- Citation
- MB2-00570
- Parties
- Claimant: XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX
- Court
- Refugee Protection Division
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 22 February 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Refugee Protection (rpd) / Final Hearing and Decision
- Outcome
- Claim rejected; claimant is not a Convention refugee or a person in need of protection.
- Legal Topics
- Convention Refugee, Political Participation, Membership of Political Party, Credibility, Arbitrary Arrest and Detention, Risk of Torture, Risk of Cruel and Unusual Treatment
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX
Claimant
Procedural Posture
Refugee Protection (rpd) / Final Hearing and Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant is a member of the UDPS
- 2 Whether the claimant was persecuted or faces a risk on a Convention ground
- 3 Credibility and corroboration of claimant's allegations
Ratio Decidendi
The panel rejected the claim because the claimant was not credible on essential elements—his asserted UDPS membership and recruitment activities were uncorroborated and contradicted by his testimony and documentary inquiry, so he did not establish a well‑founded fear of persecution or a risk of torture or cruel treatment under IRPA ss.96 and 97(1).
Court Disposition
Claim rejected; claimant is not a Convention refugee or a person in need of protection.
Orders
- Claim dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment