TB3-05263

TB3-05263

Claimants are Convention refugees because credible, corroborated evidence establishes they face a serious possibility of persecution in Bangladesh on the basis of religion and membership of a particular social group, there is no adequate state protection, and no viable internal flight alternative.

Citation
TB3-05263
Parties
Claimant: XXXXX XXXX; Claimant: XXXXX XXXXXX
Court
Refugee Protection Division
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
1 October 2013
Procedural Posture
Refugee Protection Claim Under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act / Hearing and Decision (reasons Issued)
Outcome
Claimants found to be Convention refugees; claims allowed.
Legal Topics
Convention Refugee, Persecution on Religious Grounds, State Protection, Internal Flight Alternative, Credibility Assessment, Minor Children
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

XXXXX XXXX

Claimant

XXXXX XXXXXX

Claimant

Procedural Posture

Refugee Protection Claim Under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act / Hearing and Decision (reasons Issued)

  1. 1 Whether claimants meet the definition of Convention refugee under IRPA ss.96 and 97(1)
  2. 2 Whether claimants face persecution on the basis of religion and membership of a particular social group
  3. 3 Whether adequate state protection is available in Bangladesh

Ratio Decidendi

Claimants are Convention refugees because credible, corroborated evidence establishes they face a serious possibility of persecution in Bangladesh on the basis of religion and membership of a particular social group, there is no adequate state protection, and no viable internal flight alternative.

Court Disposition

Claimants found to be Convention refugees; claims allowed.

Orders

  • Claimants determined to be Convention refugees; protection granted.